|12.11.10 at 2:09 pm ET|
‘In my opinion, he’s probably the most athletic player that’s in the game,” Varitek said. “Seeing him develop as a hitting, just being an athlete, playing more. Every year he just seems to get better. The dynamic, like Johnny Damon, his athleticism is his biggest attribute. Sometimes things happen at the plate that are so far against the book because he’s just an athlete. Him on the bases speaks for itself. Him running down balls speaks for itself. It’s a pretty interesting dynamic.’
Crawford has been a living nightmare for Varitek and other Boston catchers, going 62-for-66 in his career in steal attempts against the Red Sox. Even the great catching coach Gary Tuck had reached his wits’ end with Crawford.
“I don’t think I’ve thrown him out. I was telling him this [Friday],” Varitek said. “Tuck and I call it a window. I get to throw a ball, boom. When I throw a ball, I know if a guy’s in that window, where’s he at, if he’s going to be safe or out. I know I’m going to get him, know it’s going to be close or I know I don’t have a chance. It’s just a certain area you vision.”
The game that haunts Varitek more than any other came on May 3, 2009 at Tropicana Field when Crawford was 6-for-6 against Varitek, tying the modern MLB record for steals in a game.
“There’s probably been three times that I’ve known I’ve thrown the ball on Carl and said, ‘I’ve got him. No, I don’t got ‘em.’ His acceleration the last 15-to-20 feet was the most different view. And I’ve seen Rickey [Henderson] slide into second. I’ve seen Ichiro [Suzuki] slide into second. I’ve seen some really good basestealers. But he was different. He’s almost accelerated to the bag more than any player from that view so it’s nice to have him.”
Turns out Varitek was underselling his skills against Crawford as he has thrown out Crawford before – once in 2004.
“Oh, I did? Good for me,” Varitek said in slamming his hand down on the conference table in celebration.
|12.11.10 at 1:18 pm ET|
Bear in mind, this is someone who dreads being asked what his lineup is game-to-game, let alone three months in advance. His normal reply is “I don’t think I need to be making out tomorrow’s lineup today.”
But Saturday he sort of made an exception. At least in talking about it in general terms with Carl Crawford on board.
‘It’s a place where people care about their team,” Francona said of the excitement in Boston. “That’s alright. They’re supposed to have fun with that. But you know, it’s probably getting a little ahead of ourselves, but it’s fun, they like their team and they’re supposed to. If they’re getting excited about what our batting order is in December, that bodes well for our team.’
Then came the following question: Is he hitting second or third? That’s when Francona reverted back to his more familiar form. ‘You’re getting a little ahead of it, but we’ll get it figured out,’ he said.
He did say that he is definitely leaning toward Jacoby Ellsbury hitting leadoff.
“If he’s healthy, I still think our best lineup is with him leading off,” Francona said.
So, here’s one very popular projection of what the 2011 Red Sox will look like when they take the field at Rangers Ballpark on April 1: Ellsbury CF, Pedroia 2B, Crawford LF, Gonzalez 1B, Youkilis 3B, Ortiz DH, Drew RF, Saltalamacchia C and Scutaro SS.
The subject of the lineup did come up when Francona, Theo Epstein and management went down to meet with Crawford at his Houston-area home recently. Francona left the seven years and the $142 million to ownership.
‘When we went down to visit him, we were just kind of having fun with it,” Francona said. “You have to talk about something. I couldn’t offer the money, but we talked about where he was comfortable hitting in the batting order and what we’ll do, he was kind of telling me, ‘Hey, I can do this, I can hit first, I can hit second, I can hit third, he goes, if I do this, do you want me to do this?’
“I said, ‘What we want you to do is be yourself.’ I’ll sit down with Carl, I’ll sit down with Pedey. Obviously he’s going to hit somewhere in the top of the order, second or third, but we want to have some balance, as much as we can, with Adrian [Gonzalez] and Youk following, and David [Ortiz] and J.D. [Drew] there’s some things to think about. At the same time, if they hit, it’s not an issue for me. we’re not asking guys to do different things because they’re hitting in different areas. We just want them to be the players they are and we’ll line it up where it works best.’ Read the rest of this entry »
|12.11.10 at 12:41 pm ET|
The Red Sox formally announced the signing of Carl Crawford to a seven-year, $142 million deal Saturday, with the raspy-voiced outfielder (he was under the weather) joining Sox general manager Theo Epstein at the podium.
Here are some of the things we learned over the course of Crawford’s first visit to Fenway Park as a member of the Red Sox:
– The Nov. 30 meeting between Epstein, Red Sox manager Terry Francona and Crawford in Texas went a long way.
“Throughout the course of the conversation that you could see a synergy developing, that the things that were important to him were also important to us,” Epstein said.
“We talked about the hitters in the lineup that might complement him really well, we kind of hinted that we might be making another acquisition for a good left-handed first baseman,” added Epstein, referencing the acquisition of Adrian Gonzalez. “We got the sense that he kind of sat up in his chair as the meeting went on. We sensed some genuine excitement. We had a good feeling coming out of that meeting, but we also knew he had some attraction to other organizations as well.”
“[Epstein] came to Houston and made me feel like he really wanted me, and that was big for me to feel like I was going to go somewhere where the people actually wanted to have me,” Crawford said.
– Things gained steam in a hurry just before the deal was finalized late Wednesday night. According a major league source, the Angels had set a deadline for Crawford to accept their offer by 11 p.m. Wednesday. The Red Sox received a call from the agents shortly after 8 p.m. that night relaying what it would take to get a deal done. While the Red Sox’ part of the deal that included the money increased as the deadline approached, the team had always been offering the seven years.
“We’ve been working on it for a while,” Epstein said. “We really liked where we were. As far as our position in the negotiations, we felt we had made a connection with Carl at the meeting, and that he was really intrigued by being part of our lineup, especially after we traded for Adrian, that kind of piqued his interest even more. We thought we were well positioned and we were prepared to under the radar grind it out a little bit, stay involved. We felt like, in the end, he would want to stay here. Then another club put a deadline on him and we had just a couple of hours to make a decisive move.
In the end, contrary to initial reports immediately after the deal was done that the Angels’ offer was for $108 million, it is believed that the Los Angeles proposal was comparable to the one presented by the Red Sox.
“There were very competitive, if not identical, financial offers at the end,” Epstein said. “His agents asked if everybody is at the end, ultimately at the end, where do you want to be, and he said Boston. It came to quickly on another team’s deadline, so we were able to act quickly.”
– The Red Sox feel Crawford has come a long way as a hitter, especially since the outfielder introduced Epstein to the world of general managing in the big leagues with a walk-off home run in the Sox’ GM first game in his position with the Sox in 2003. (That home run came off of reliever Chad Fox on a low-inside slider.)
“He really has evolved as a player, and a hitter particularly,” Epstein said.
“At that time (in 2003), you really wanted to stay away from one spot, you wanted to stay away from down and inside to him because it wasn’t that he couldn’t handle pitches in other zones, like up and away, but there were just so much you could do with those pitches. You could sort of limit your damage by throwing those pitches in the strike zone. It was a tough, but appropriate, start to my general managing career.”
Epstein noted that Crawford, whose power throughout his career has primarily been to right field, will be working on driving the ball the other way to take advantage of Fenway’s left field wall.
“As a hitter he covers so much more of the zone that he used to,” the GM said. “That pitch away from him, he’s really comfortable hitting that ball to left field. At times, and I think this is what I think he’s going to work on this winter, really driving the ball the other way, not just slapping it the other way, but driving it.
“I do see sustainable power for him. Right field is a little bit deeper than parts of Tropicana. But when he hits them they’re no-doubters.”
– As Epstein said, the Red Sox “are not going to apologize” for the size of the contract.
“We also have to look at our situation where we’re competing within a division, especially with a team, that has significant resources, so we have to do the best to compete,” Epstein said. “I know this is a significant long contract, I don’t think this is an irresponsible spend at all. If you look at it, our discipline over the years, our reliance on young players, the acquisition of someone like Adrian Gonzalez making $6.3 million, puts us in a position to do this.
“If you look at the biggest contracts in the history of the game, you have to go really far down the list to find one that we’ve done. This is the first contract of this nature that we’ve done since I took over as GM and since this ownership has been here. We’ve tried to do others in the past and we’ve walked away because of limits, and we would have walked away because of limits on this one as well. But one contract like this one in eight or nine offseasons I don’t think irresponsible. I think it’s the aggressiveness that complements the framework of discipline of value and reliance of young players that we have.
“I’ve worked in a small market where you can’t even consider acquisitions like this, and that’s part of the equation down there. This is part of the equations for teams and and markets like ours and given that we’ve been really selective over the years in showing restraint over the years. This one made a lot of sense because of how we were positioned, adding the players of the caliber of Gonzalez and Crawford, who are 28 and 29 years old, respectively, and in their prime years. It makes a ton of sense for me. We’re not going to apologize for this.”
The breakdown for Crawford’s contract is as follows: ’11: $14 million; ’12: $19.5 million; ’13: $20 million; ’14: $20.25 million; ’15: $20.5 million; ’16: $20.75 million; ’17: $21 million.
– While Crawford said he will hit anywhere in the order the Red Sox put him, Red Sox manager Terry Francona noted that the lefty hitter will almost certainly hit somewhere near the top of the lineup, perhaps second or third.
– The Red Sox viewed Crawford as a significantly better player than Jayson Werth.
|12.11.10 at 12:35 pm ET|
Sporting the World Series championship ring from 2007, Jason Varitek sat comfortably Saturday in his seat at the end of a conference table in room off the EMC Club at Fenway Park, declaring that he’s is more than ready to return for the 2011 season.
‘It’s awesome, it’s awesome,” said Varitek, who signed a one-year deal for $2 million, plus incentives. “Did I hope for it? Yes, I hoped for it and wished that it would happen. Did I necessarily this go-around, they may go in other directions? Yeah. I was excited I didn’t have to make that final decision.’
What Varitek returns to is one of the best scenarios he could have hoped for with Carl Crawford and Adrian Gonzalez on board.
“It’s like a tale of two different [scenarios],” Varitek said. “The [Red Sox] Nation wasn’t as happy as they are now with what’s gone on. To expect it, no. To expect us to win, yes and how much that takes to do that, you have to be in the right places. That gives us a chance but we still have big steps to take for this team to be good.”
But he admitted that between the end of the season and Saturday, this was the off-season he actually thought he might not return as captain as the Red Sox.
‘This, more than any time in my career, I had probably the most interest from other teams and it was probably in the same regards that they have a need for the same and have a same type thing and it might not be here [in Boston],” said Varitek, who did not disclose the teams or how far along he was in the process.
‘You don’t know what’s going to happen. You never know what’s going to happen with injuries, etcetera. So I have to prepare like I know how to prepare everyday to physically and mentally be ready to play every day. That’s not necessarily the case but physically that’s what I have to do.’
A broken right foot limited Varitek to just 39 games in 2010, when he hit .232 and belted seven homers for the Red Sox as a back-up to Victor Martinez. He comes back in 2010 and actually could have a more prominent role on the team as he helps Jarrod Saltalamacchia learn the pitching staff.
‘Going into this last one, I figured a few more years but I don’t know,” Varitek said. “At this point of my career it’s almost a year to year basis of seeing where I’m at but physically, I think it’s a few more years.’
‘I’m excited,” Red Sox manager Terry Francona said. “I think ‘Tek did an amazing job on the transition. That’s not an easy thing to do, to be like a stalwart. For many, many years be the captain, and then be asked to handle a reduced role, I think what Tek did, his role didn’t get reduced. He didn’t allow it to be.
“He picked it up in other areas, whether it was helping out the other catchers or his teammates, and as much as we appreciated, that’s why we appreciate it, because it’s not easy. He handled it with a lot of class and dignity. We’re actually thrilled he’s back. I think it’s easy to lose sight, because he got injured last year. but he was having a really productive year. this isn’t all about helping salty. This is about helping us win games. he’s going to catch.’
|12.11.10 at 11:23 am ET|
According to a major league source, the Red Sox finalized the seven-year, $140 million deal for Carl Crawford 10 minutes before an 11 p.m. Wednesday deadline set the Angels. Momentum in the negotiations gained steam shortly after 8 p.m. when the agents for Crawford informed both teams of the parameters it would take to get a contract done. While the Red Sox did increase the monetary portion of their offer as the Angels’ deadline approached, they had consistently been at seven years. For more Red Sox coverage, see the team page at weei.com/redsox.
|12.10.10 at 7:39 pm ET|
According to multiple reports, the Angels have signed free agent relief left-handed pitcher Scott Downs to a three-year deal worth $15 million.
MLB.com/NESN’s Peter Gammons and Fox Sports’ Ken Rosenthal both reported the deal, with Rosenthal noting that Downs can make up an extra $1 million based on games finished. The Blue Jays will receive a first-round compensation pick and a second-rounder from the Angels in next year’s draft for the Type A free agent.
Over his last four years, Downs has posted a 2.36 earned run average for the Blue Jays.
|12.09.10 at 2:59 pm ET|
ESPN baseball analyst John Kruk joined The Big Show on Thursday, praising the Red Sox for the signing of Carl Crawford and noting that it is now crucial for the Yankees to sign free-agent starter Cliff Lee.
“It’s imperative,” Kruk said. “Not just because he’s left handed, but because Phil Hughes and CC Sabathia are the only to starters that are dependable. They need another one if they want to compete.”
Kruk pointed out that Crawford was likely drawn to the Red Sox because of the stability in the lineup and that “they can win two or three championships by the time” his deal expires.
Even if the Yankees were to sign Lee, Kruk felt that the Red Sox would still the best team in the league.
While he applauded the move to get Crawford, Kruk saw the acquisition of Adrian Gonzalez as the Sox’ biggest move, saying that “they just got an MVP” by trading for the slugging first baseman.
“He might be the best hitter in baseball in that ball park,” Kruk said of Gonzalez. “‘¦ It’s not going to shock me if he’s a 50-50 guy with 50 homers and 50 doubles in that ballpark. ‘¦ His average is going to go up at least 30 points just because he’s hitting in Fenway.”
Latest from Bleacher Report
- Top 40 in Review: Deven Marrero and Trey Ball
- Help Wanted: Writers
- Top 40 in Review: Michael Kopech and Sean Coyle
- Top 40 in Review: Wendell Rijo and Edwin Escobar
- Top 40 Season in Review: Travis Shaw and Sam Travis
- Fall/Winter League Roundup: Marrero dominates in AFL
- Top 40 in Review: Nick Longhi and Teddy Stankiewicz
- Top 40 in Review: Heath Hembree and Steven Wright
- Top 40 Season in Review: Javier Guerra and Henry Ramos
- Top 40 in Review: Simon Mercedes and Carlos Asuaje