It just seems to me, that sinse the begining of this whole ‘Steriods “Scandal” ‘, there has been information that was access-able to everyone- including every Media outlet ( including the NY Times ), that was either not exciting enough to read, print, fully digest or otherwise. We all like information that can be sensationalized. Can’t really sell a story AND include facts that also dismiss the whole point of your story. So yeah, I might be among the few… but I’ll take David Ortiz’s explaination as the truth. Yes! I trust David Ortiz ( who doesn’t have to sell newspapers ) over the Ny Times or a unknown lawyer who won’t show his face. Call me crazy.

i think the media dropped the ball in this press conference. they did not ask the right questions. for instance. these supplements and vitamins you speak of were any of these if the form of a needle. did you ever take a needle or are you saying they were all taken orally.did you take androsteien. were you buying them yourself or was a trainer saying take this and you never really asked what you were taking. can you compile a list of everything you were taking so it can be tested and confirmed it would not pass the test.but yet is not a steroid. to many questions remain unanswered!

The guilt (if any) belongs with the Players Union and MLB for such a confusing and poorly administered testing process back in 2003. It was a survey test. David Ortiz did nothing wrong. He came forward and has been very sincere about what he did (and did NOT do). The blame (if any) belongs to whom ever is leaking the names of people when they really don’t even know why they are on the list. Someone needs to find the people leaking the names and prosecute them.

Steroids are bad and should not be part of baseball, but this 2003 list means nothing. If someone tests positive now then they should be punished, but this 2003 list was at the very beginning to get a baseline test. Let’s all move on…

Just like Nomar said. “THE LIST IS A JOKE!” this is a non issue

I can smell the taint on the 2004 & 2007 WS “wins” when this list does come out every member of those teams will be on it.

The broom comes out on Sunday night……”Yankees win, The Yankees win”!

How does the Yankees A$$ look from soon to be 5.5 games back?

BTW I just LOVE Big Sloppy’s Pimp suit………slob

“Just like Nomar said. “THE LIST IS A JOKE!” this is a non issue”

Funny, when A-rod was on it in spring training that list was the end all to get all.

They don’t call you MASS-HOLES for nothing loser.

Really pee diddy? Wow that’s a clever name. I know the 2004 and 2007 must be tainted considering we beat a clean Yankees team in 04. Oh no wait they weren’t clean either, with Aroid leading the way. Nice try though.

His explanation sound a little fishy to me coming a week or so after the FDA warned of steroids in some supplements. Maybe this was lawyers taking and not Ortiz.

Extremely intriguing post. Do you plan on introducing extra information or maybe blogging more? My own web site is DE Computer Repair I actually hope you actually won’t mind however I actually have posted your personal webpage to some of my friends as well. Superior job! By chance would you want to exhange webpages?

Greetings! This is my first comment here so I just wanted to give a quick shout out and tell you I genuinely enjoy reading through your blog posts. Can you recommend any other blogs/websites/forums that deal with the same topics? Thank you so much!

I have really enjoyied reading your well written article. It looks like you spend a lot of effort and time on your blog. I have bookmarked it and I am looking forward to reading new articles. Keep up the good work!

Pretty good post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wanted to say that I have really enjoyed reading your blog posts. Anyway I’ll be subscribing to your feed and I hope you post again soon.

After I initially commented I clicked the -Notify me when new feedback are added- checkbox and now each time a remark is added I get four emails with the identical comment. Is there any method you can take away me from that service? Thanks!

But beware! If a single supplier does not stock every item you’d like, and you’re arranging to mix and match your oak bathroom furniture, be very cautious to deliberately acquire contrasting oak pieces, or take samples with you from one supplier towards the subsequent – oak is a natural material and also veneered items differ in their grain and colour tone. You can not, as with easy white bathroom furniture, but several pieces from diverse suppliers and anticipate that they’ll match up – but using a bit of care, it is possible to guarantee your new pieces do all complement one another, and complement your space as a whole.