Full Count
A Furiously Updated Red Sox Blog
WEEI.com Blog Network
Clay Buchholz open to Jon Lester-style extension 02.15.11 at 4:44 pm ET
By

Clay Buchholz would welcome a long-term deal in the mold of the one teammate Jon Lester has. (AP)

FORT MYERS, Fla. — To this point, the Red Sox haven’t talked with either right-hander Clay Buchholz or his representatives about the possibility of a long-term deal. But Buchholz, who has made clear on a number of occasions that he would be open to such a deal, has had conversations with his agents about what a long-term deal might look like. And precedent suggests that the young right-hander who finished sixth in AL Cy Young voting in 2010 need look no further than a teammate to figure out the sort of years and dollars to expect if he wants to gain financial security from the Sox.

Jon Lester offers a fairly clear indicator of the type of deal that Buchholz might be able to get from the Sox. He signed a deal that will keep him in Boston through at least 2013 during spring training of 2009. At that time, Lester had two years and 75 days of big league service time. After a breakout 2008 campaign in which he went 16-6 with a 3.21 ERA, he had a career mark of 27-8 with a 3.81 ERA, 6.6 strikeouts per nine innings, 3.6 walks per nine and a 1.393 WHIP.

Buchholz is at a nearly identical position in his career. He has two years, 59 days of big league service time. After his outstanding 2010 season, in which he went 17-7 with a 2.33 ERA, he is a career 29-21 pitcher with a 3.68 ERA, 7.0 strikeouts and 3.8 walks per nine innings with a WHIP of 1.356.

Their careers have not been identical, but they’ve followed similar enough trajectories that the five-year, $30 million deal (which includes a $13 million Sox team option for 2014) that Lester signed before the start of the 2009 season would clearly serve as the relevant data point in talks should Buchholz and the Sox engage in dialogue about a long-term deal.

Already, both Blue Jays lefty Ricky Romero (five years, $30.1 million with a $13 million option) and Brewers right-hander Yovani Gallardo (five years, $30.1 million with a $13 million option) have used the Lester deal as the basis for their own long-term deals. And Buchholz, 26, said that those contracts would guide what he might seek in talks with the Sox about a long-term contract.

“I think that would definitely be a base model for it — numbers-wise, security reasons, I think every player with less than three years of service time, that’s what they strive for,” said Buchholz. “I’m not saying I’m as good as Lester or I deserve what he got, but just from the other guys who signed their deal in the past year or so with the same service, I think that’s definitely a good starting point if there ever was one.”

The Sox have a team policy that a long-term deal with players who have accumulated fewer than six years of service time and remain under team control should cover the player’s first free agent season and include a team option. In Buchholz’ case, that would conceivably mean a five-year deal with an option for the 2016 season. Buchholz said that he would have no qualms about a deal of such duration, given his attachment to the Red Sox organization.

“It’s all I know. I definitely wouldn’t mind. Definitely, just from the guys who are coming here who have played somewhere else for a good while in their career, coming here and picking to come here, it shows you something about the organization. It’s a great place to play, obviously. The fan base is good. I think it’s a better environment to come out and play the first day in spring training when you actually have people in camp and have people hollering and screaming,” Buchholz said. “I just think it’d be a great place to be for a while.”

Read More: Clay Buchholz, Jon Lester, long term deal, Print  |  Email  |  Bark It Up!  |  Digg It
  • Jordan

    I can only hope Lester and Buch stay in Sox uniforms for the rest of their careers. Wouldn’t that a story. Two incredibly talented pitchers who stay together through the farm system and play for the same team through-out their career.

  • babe ruth

    Guy has one good year and now he is looking for a lester type deal. wouldn’t be surprised if he has a bad year. He better have a good year with lester, with those other two bums Slackey, and Beckett who’s era against the yankees was over 9, the yankees love Beckett

  • Peter Hamilton

    I’d prefer Buch with a Lester deal over Lackey with a Lackey deal…

  • McNab

    “wouldn’t be surprised if he has a bad year.”?? Based on…what? The fact that he backed up the rookie no-hitter with steady improvement, leading to last year’s performance: AL 2nd in ERA and 3rd in win percentage? Only his second year wasn’t so good…but taken as a whole, from his 1st to his 4th year shows very good improvement.

  • anon

    As a fan who got to see him at McCoy and move up to the bigs, I really hope we keep him in Boston.

  • McNab

    Babe, you’re sounding a bit muffled…probably because we buried you ’bout a mile underground during the greatest, most memorable upset in sports history. Ever.

  • joker

    Wrong again Sox fans, the greatest upset in sports history is the 1980 winter games in which we beat the russians in hockey. The sox will bring up 2004 forever because that’s about the only history they have. The Yankees on the other hand are the Team of the century and that will never change.

  • TeddyBallgame

    You’re dead on joker. The Red Sox were clearly the better team in 2004, so it can’t be considered an upset. Blowing a 3 games to none lead, however was the biggest choke job in the history of sports. Own it.

  • McNab

    choker, had the roles been reversed, you wouldn’t be bringing up hockey. I’m (way) old enough to have been around for both…’04 was more exciting than ’80, unless you’re purely an Olympics fan, and not a professional sports fan.
    “the team of the century”?? Which century would THAT be, joke…sure not this one. Bit behind the times, aintcha?

  • Bobby Bosox

    Buchholz a workhorse type of pitcher. He would be a good investment. Not sure he will ever be a super star but doubt he will be a ‘shooting star’.

  • babe ruth

    Behind the times? what do you mean? the last time i checked the yankees have won the world series more recently then the Sox. The Sox have done nothing in 4 years. Could be another 86 years before they win another. I never did believe there was a curse the sox just sucked for 86 years

  • McNab

    Wow. Thanks for clearing up the definition of “the century” for us! And I always thought that it was a 100-year block of time, starting with 1801, 1901, 2001, etc. Just can’t keep up with you Yankers!

    So anyway, droolbucket; when sesame street is over, take your hands out of wherever the are, put up your pointer finger and the one next to it…that would be the Bosox wins….THIS century! (That’s the number two, btw). Now put one down. In addition to your i.q., that’s the wins for the Yankers. You’re dead and buried babe…get back in the hole.

  • http://stylewweathervane.multiply.com/journal/item/1/Weathervane_Top_Of_The_Line weathervane

    Hey there this is kind of of off topic but I was wanting to know if blogs use WYSIWYG editors or if you have to manually code with HTML. I’m starting a blog soon but have no coding expertise so I wanted to get guidance from someone with experience. Any help would be greatly appreciated!

  • http://ndgoon.blogspot.com Goon

     They would have thrown the book at him. Shannahan is a farce and the fact that he says these types of things means he knows the jig is up.

Red Sox Box Score
Red Sox Schedule
Baseball Analytics Blog
Red Sox Headlines
Down on the Farm
Red Sox Minor League News
Red Sox Team Leaders
MLB Headlines
Tips & Feedback

Verify