Full Count
A Furiously Updated Red Sox Blog
WEEI.com Blog Network
Why Josh Beckett is the Red Sox’ newest fourth starter 03.17.11 at 2:18 pm ET
By Rob Bradford

FORT MYERS, Fla. — The biggest news of the day (besides the fact they ran out of corned beef in the press box)? Josh Beckett being slated as the No. 4 starter to start the season.

Jon Lester will be No. 1, John Lackey No. 2, Clay Buchholz No. 3, and Beckett in the fourth spot, with Daisuke Matsuzaka coming in at No. 5.

So why are the Red Sox taking this route? Here are some suggestions:

1. When Terry Francona says the Sox want to put Beckett in the best position to get off to a good start, he means it.

You’re talking about finding some success for a guy who still has a season that included a 6-6 with a 5.78 ERA. While he is coming off a Sept. which included a respectable 4.50 ERA for the month, that same stretch included hitters batting .316 against him. Simply put: Beckett has to get that bad taste of ’10 out of his mouth as soon as possible.

7.22 Beckett pointed out that he got off to a bad start in ’09 (ERA) and went on to have one of his best season in the bigs, saying, “I look back at ’09 and I started off terrible and I put together a three- or four-month stretch there that I’ve never been in that kind of position before. That’s as good as I’ve ever pitched in the big leagues, in ’09. Take away a couple of August starts and that’s probably the best year I’ve ever had. I got off to a horrible start and had a bad August. It’s always important.”

But this is different. He has never had to rebound from such depths as he found himself in last season.

2. The Indians offer the best chance to find some out-of-the-gate success.

One of Beckett’s best outings in ’10 came against the Indians, an Aug. 3 outing in which he allowed one run on three hits over eight innings. With the possible exception of Travis Hafner (5-for-15), none of the current members of the Cleveland hitters have had significant success against Beckett, with catalysts Grady Sizemore (3-for-16, .188) and Orlando Cabrera (10-for-43, .233).

The Rangers would have been a different story. In two outings against Texas in ’10, Beckett allowed 13 runs in 12 innings, giving up seven in seven innings the first time around, and six (and 10 hits) in five frames on Aug. 13.

3. It offers Beckett a bit more time to make sure he has everything where he wants it.

Most came away from the righty’s latest outing in Bradenton encouraged by what Beckett delivered. His changeup — a pitch he prioritized the first few innings — was effective. The fastball hit 94 mph. And his curveball, while still not as powerful as it was in ’07, found its target more consistently than during his struggles in ’10.

One element of Beckett’s repertoire that still needs to be uncovered is the darting two-seam fastball, that served as a primary weapon when he went on the aforementioned run during the ’09 campaign.

John Lackey

Beckett did say Thursday that he was extremely encouraged by Wednesday’s bullpen session, one which allowed for the correction of a few flaws in the pitcher’s delivery.

4. Lackey may be better equipped to take on the Rangers.

While the righty has experienced some ups and downs while pitching in the American League West when facing the Rangers, his success against Texas last season was definitive. In one July 17 outing, Lackey held the Rangers to two runs over seven innings in picking up the win.

Lackey has had trouble throughout his career with a few of the Rangers’ hitters (Ian Kinsler and Josh Hamilton are both hitting over .400 against the hurler for their careers), the new Sox’ No. 2 starter has far and away the most familiarity with the Texas lineup. Lackey has started more games against the Rangers than any other pitcher in the past decade (33).

Read More: Clay Buchholz, Indians, john lackey, Jon Lester Print  |  Email  |  Bark It Up!  |  Digg It
  • BT

    I’m curious as to why Lackey is 2, and Buchholz is 3. Why wouldn’t you put your two more dominant pitchers of 2010 in the first two games? Does anyone really want Lackey starting the home opener?

    As for Beckett at 4, I agree with you, Rob. Let him handle Cleveland’s weaker lineup, and boost his confidence.

  • RonG

    I think this rotation is set up properly. I like Lackey as the #2 because I am confident that he will rebound this year to win between 15-17 games. As good as Buchholz was last season, I’m sure that he is happy as the #3.
    Furtermore, once you get past the first week or two of the season very rarely does your teams 1-5 match up against the oponnents 1-5.orld Series or bust.

    Go Red Sox………….World Series or bust.

  • SoxOrGoHoMe

    I think it’s smart to separate Lester and Buchholz. Those are the two dominant starts in the rotation and they both eat up innings (although so does Lackey). To give your bullpen a rest it’s not a bad idea to seperate the two guys in the rotation who have the best shot at going 7 or 8 innings in a game. That way you don’t have to use up Bard and Jenks on back to back days. Although, if Daisuke and Beckett pitched like they did in 2010 then the bullpen is going to have their hands full. If they both pitch like they did in 2007 then we’re definitely playoff bound. Lackey has looked good so far this spring and I think Beckett is coming along. I watched the Pirates outing he had and his stuff was there. He was throwing his curveball for strikes and his changeup was flat out nasty, eliciting multiple swings and misses. He left a couple 4 seamers flat and up in the zone and ran some 2 seamers out of the zone in which the hitters didn’t bite at at all. He did fine save for a handful of bad pitches. It was a very positive outing though in my opinion. If Beckett is throwing 94 mph, curveballs for strikes, and changeups that have some nasty late break then Sox fans don’t have anything to worry about. With this lineup, we really don’t need Beckett to pitch like and ace anyways (although it’d obviously help).

  • JimDaytona

    Genius on Francona’s part.

  • Connor

    I completely agree with this rotation. Lester is hands down the ace of the staff.
    As fare as the agrument of Lackey vs. Buchholz in the #2 slot, I think it’s more based on Buchholz’s skills rather than Lackey’s. Think about it, in the #3 slot, Buchholz, arguably the second best pitcher on the staff, will be faceing #3 slot pitching talent, which equals more wins.
    Hopefully this lights a fire under Beckett’s butt!

  • babe ruth

    makes sense Lester is great, Lackey sucks, Bucholtz is very good, Beckett sucks, and Dice-K sucks

  • Your Mom

    This is a nice piece of work on Tito’s part. It’s not about lighting a fire under anyone’s butt, it’s about getting off on the right foot. It’s a good psychological move for all the starters. And ‘Tek said it right when he said it didn’t matter how the initial rotation looked, because it always changes until the playoffs when it’s reset. This is what good managing looks like.

  • Rick

    Hey Babe, it’s better than sucks, sucks, sucks, sucks and sucks. And you know who I’m talkin’ about baby.

  • darklighter

    Beckett has been lousy even this Spring so letting him in at less than 5 is being kind. Whoever said he looked good during the Pirates game was having delusions. Just like last year he’s pretty good through 3 or 4 before he’s just batting practice out there. And we were talking about against THE PIRATES!!! Oy…

  • http://WEEI MoneyBall

    Beckett is a competitor – let him work his way back to the #2.

  • Habhater

    I think Thomas should go as well. His stunt at the Whitehouse was something should not have happened. This was a team celebration and he should have been there period.

    Timmy’s had his run, it’s Tukka time now. Trade Thomas, get what you can for him and move forward. We need some more talent up front and moving Thomas out might help us get there.

  • Fowle33

    Keep them intact and things will fall in place.  Repeat is difficult, come back the following year and get it done is just as good in my books!  Let’s go BRUINS!!

  • Alex

    Trade Thomas; he’s not a team player after he refused to attend the White House event honoring the Bruins.

  • Robert Minotti

    TRADE THOMAS…I used to really like him, but his stunt was selfish. PC should try to trade him for a top 5 draft pick in June. 

  • Matt

    Everyone’s so quick to turn on the man that just won the cup for the Bs a year ago, but unfortunately I agree. the Bruins could have a solid backup in Khudobin if given the opportunity but I cant imagine Thomas would produce a top 5 draft pick by himself. But who know Timmy plus the Bruins first rounder to move into the top 5 is definetly a viable trade option. Its no mystery that the Oilers need a solid goaltender and defense.. Why not thomas and a defender for one of their many offensive talents? Lots of possibilities with TT30 just dont see Chiarelli doing anything in the offseason until Rask proves he has recovered from injury.

Boston Red Sox vs Tampa Bay Rays - Fenway Park, Boston, MA
[find tickets]
Boston Red Sox vs Tampa Bay Rays - Fenway Park, Boston, MA
[find tickets]
Boston Red Sox vs Tampa Bay Rays - Fenway Park, Boston, MA
[find tickets]

Red Sox Box Score
Red Sox Headlines
Red Sox Minor League News
Red Sox Team Leaders
MLB Headlines
Tips & Feedback

Verify