Full Count
A Furiously Updated Red Sox Blog
WEEI.com Blog Network
John Henry: Red Sox, Cubs had ‘basic misunderstanding’ on Theo Epstein compensation 02.25.12 at 11:37 am ET
By Alex Speier


FORT MYERS, Fla. — In the end, Red Sox owners suggested the proper outcome occurred in the negotiations with the Cubs for compensation for permitting former Boston GM Theo Epstein to leave his post with one year left on his contract to become the president of baseball operations for the Cubs. Earlier this week, the Red Sox received right-hander Chris Carpenter and a player to be named from Chicago in exchange for a player to be named.

That said, principal owner John Henry said that there was some misunderstanding in his conversations with Cubs owner Tom Ricketts that led to what he viewed as a somewhat unsatisfying outcome.

“How satisfied are we?” mused Henry. “In a negotiation, both sides are never, if it’s a tough negotiation, both sides are generally a little unhappy with the way it works. The Cubs probably aren’t ‘happy’ with it; we probably aren’t ‘happy’ with it. Given the amount of time that was spent on it, it probably was the appropriate result.

“I think there was a basic misunderstanding between Tom Ricketts and I when we first spoke about it,” added Henry. “I really admire Tom Ricketts as an owner. He’s one of the best owners in baseball. It’s a great organization. We probably had a misunderstanding at least as far as expectation. There was no real agreement. It was just sort of, the best way to explain it is we probably had different expectations based on the first conversation as to what was transpiring.”

Carpenter is a hard-throwing right-hander with a 95-100 mph fastball and a slider who projects as a likely late-innings relief option in the near future. While Lucchino acknowledged on WEEI’s Dennis & Callahan show that he did not represent the type of haul that the Sox had expected in exchange for Epstein, he and the team were no longer dwelling on a matter that’s now resolved.

““We have a saying at the Red Sox – you’ve heard it before – all’s well that ends, period,” said Lucchino. “Let’s move on, next issue.”

Print  |  Email  |  Bark It Up!  |  Digg It
  • http://twitter.com/runaway3124 Devan Curry

    This is why its important to read.  They were originally the 2nd overall pick.  The article says they traded down to number 6 weeks ago, followed by trading down to number 14.

  • Mike

    Not sure I see the Pats as losers–this year quality over quantity and if all 4 players make a contribution, combined with the moves in free agency then I think the Pats will have no problem with less picks.

    Would have to disagree on the Rams…Sam Bradford got killed last year and still has no one to throw to…

  • DS211

    There’s no problem with the Pats not having any picks past the 2nd round, they end up cutting those guys every year anyways. 

  • Gman

    Besides that, they can still trade down and get into some of the later rounds if they don’t like who is available.

  • Guest

    They cut Hernandez?

  • Litchester

    Do you proofread at all?

  • Horace Ivory

    right dummy but they traded the 2nd about 6 weeks ago to the skins so they could draft RG3. Where have you been? Read what he wrote it is clearly in there

  • Innovator

    Yes they did originally,,,then traded it to the Redskins…

  • Daveryan_22

    @Josh…they had #2 overall, and traded to Wash in the RG3 deal.

  • Jimmy Freeze

    Not sure why anyone would even worry 1 second over lack of late picks…
    1st rounders have a 75% hit rate
    2nd rounders have a 50% hit rate
    3rd rounders have a 25% hit rate
    after that it’s 10% or so…meaning every other year you find 1 guy that’s any good after round 3

    Bill has been bucking the statistical trend by making more late picks, and he has had predictably inconsistant results…Ernie Adams must have finally showed him the odds, because this year Bill’s finally going for quality vs throwing them away on qty.

    Everybody remembers Tom Brady in the 6th round, but forgets the other 40 stiffs they’ve wasted picks on the last 10 years.

  • Justoneguysopinion

    Please, please, please use both 2nd round picks.  The Pats don’t need depth.  They had depth players last year.  The problem was the depth players were starting or at the very least playing way too much.  They need to draft impact players and those players are found in rounds 1 and 2.  GO PATS!!!

  • Cas G

    No pick after the 2nd round? Who cares…remember when Mike Ditka traded all his picks for Ricky Williams in 1999. Ditka put the wig on and declared “I’m goin fishin” …priceless!

  • PVS53

    If BB gets the player he wants with one of the second round picks, then he will probably trade the other pick for two addtional picks in the later rounds. He will only make the trade if he sees a player or two worth drafting in the later rounds.

  • Benny

    I am almost positive BB will either trade down or trade one of his second round picks for later picks!!  He is probably jonesing to acquire more picks!!

Red Sox Box Score
Red Sox Schedule
Baseball Analytics Blog
Red Sox Headlines
Red Sox Minor League News
Red Sox Team Leaders
MLB Headlines
Tips & Feedback

Verify