Full Count
A Furiously Updated Red Sox Blog
WEEI.com Blog Network
Red Sox, Dodgers appear close to blockbuster sending Adrian Gonzalez, Josh Beckett and Carl Crawford to LA for prospects 08.25.12 at 7:38 am ET
By Alex Speier

Adrian Gonzalez

The incentive for the Red Sox to steam forward in a sweeping roster overhaul — a potential blockbuster sending first baseman Adrian Gonzalez, right-hander Josh Beckett and outfielder Carl Crawford along with utility infielder Nick Punto to the Dodgers in exchange for first baseman James Loney and multiple prospects — is fairly evident. While a major league source said that a deal is not expected on Friday night, it does appear to be gaining momentum to the point where the two teams have exchanged medical records to review as a prelude to a potential deal, whose logic makes all the sense in the world for a Red Sox team that has fallen out of contention.

It’s no secret: In a 12-month span from Dec. 2009 to Dec. 2010, the Red Sox made a series of calculated, high-risk gambles meant to secure a championship core for the long haul, only to see their bets blow up in spectacular fashion. It started in Dec. 2009, when the team signed John Lackey to a five-year, $82.5 million deal through 2014. That was followed by a four-year, $68 million extension in April 2010 that secured the services of Josh Beckett through 2014. The following offseason, after the Sox missed the playoffs, the team traded for first baseman Adrian Gonzalez and agreed to the parameters of a seven-year, $154 million extension (on top of his $6.3 million salary in 2011) that would keep him in Boston through 2018. And, finally, the Sox signed free agent Carl Crawford to a seven-year, $142 million contract at the Dec. 2010 winter meetings, with the deal running from 2011-17.

For a time, it appeared that the Sox had set themselves up for the long haul. But when the team fell apart last September, missing the playoffs by a game — following a 2011 season in which Crawford and Lackey (who required Tommy John surgery) had performed poorly, and in which Beckett had been viewed as a central culprit in a clubhouse that fell apart, those deals started to look ominous, particularly given all that followed in 2012.

The Sox had little to no flexibility to pursue roster upgrades last offeason, at least in the absence of deals to move salary (such as the one that sent Marco Scutaro to the Rockies so that the team would have money to sign Cody Ross). And so, at a time when pitchers such as Hiroki Kuroda, Edwin Jackson and Roy Oswalt were there for the taking on appealing one-year deals, the Sox did not have the available cash reserves within their payroll to make competitive bids for them.

Meanwhile, Gonzalez and Beckett — All-Stars in 2011 — endured dramatic regressions in 2012, while Crawford — after a career-worst 2011 season — missed most of the year before returning for 31 games and then undergoing season-ending surgery.

Beckett has had numerous health issues (thumb, lat, shoulder back) while going 5-11 with a 5.23 ERA. Multiple talent evaluators believed that he was unmovable — at least unless the Sox agreed to pick up much (perhaps the majority) of the remaining money owed to him — in a trade. He is owed approximately $34 million over the next two-plus years. He’s also been dogged by off-the-field controversy, including his role in the chicken-and-beer scandal at the end of last year and a golf outing while being skipped due to his lat injury this year.

He would have to approve a trade — as a player with 10 years of big league service time and five years with the same time — and as of late Friday night, according to a source familiar with the situation, the Sox had not asked Beckett whether he would sign off on a deal. However, the source said that the sides are optimistic that his approval will not hold up a deal.

Gonzalez has had a disappointing sophomore year in Boston, hitting .300 with a .343 OBP, .469 slugging mark, .812 OPS and 15 homers this year, a marked decline from his first year in Boston, when he hit .338/.410/.548/.947 with 27 homers and 117 RBI in 2011. The performance decline has been accompanied by questions about his fit and makeup for Boston, with one major league source recently stating, upon hearing that the Dodgers had claimed him on waivers, “He’s not a winning player … [The Red Sox] should dump him.”

Crawford is in the second season of a seven-year, $142 million deal. He underwent Tommy John surgery for his torn ulnar collateral ligament in his left elbow after hitting .282/.306/.479/.795 in 31 games; he is out for the rest of this year and possibly part of next season. According to Jon Heyman of CBSSports.com, Crawford has the right to veto a deal to the Dodgers in his contract, but it remains to be seen whether he would use that right either to block a deal or to try to extract more money from the sides to relocate.

Punto is in the first year of a two-year, $3 million deal signed this past offseason. In 65 games, he’s hitting .200/.301/.272/.573 as a role player who has served as a backup at all four infield positions. He’s fallen behind Mike Aviles and Pedro Ciriaco as a utility option.

Under the framework of the deal that the two teams have discussed, the Sox would contribute an amount “very close” to $10 million of the approximately $270 million remaining on the contracts of their four players. In addition to considerable financial flexibility, the Sox would also get a number of players — including some impressive pitching prospects — in return.

According to a major league source, the Red Sox would get Loney (who was scratched from the Dodgers lineup against the Marlins) as well as prospects Allen Webster, Rubby De La Rosa, Ivan De Jesus and Jerry Sands as well as perhaps one other prospect in a deal.

Webster, 22, and De La Rosa, 23, are the prizes. Webster, ranked the No. 95 prospect in the game by Baseball America entering this year, is 6-8 with a 3.55 ERA, 8.7 strikeouts and 4.2 walks per nine with Double-A Chattanooga. Baseball America said that he compared in some respects to Derek Lowe while offering the following scouting report:

“Webster shows plus pitches across the board when he has everything working. He has an easy delivery and 90-95 mph fastball that peaks at 97 mph with plenty of sink, helping him generate grounders all day long. He throws both a slider and curveball that are plus pitches at times, though at others he gets caught between the two. He has some trouble staying on top of his curve but it shows sharp three-quarters bite when it’s on. Webster’s changeup could be his best pitch, featuring sink and fade at 79-83 mph, though some scouts think he tips it off by slowing his arm speed.”

De La Rosa has had recent health issues but possesses considerable upside. In 13 games (10 starts) last year, he was 4-5 with a 3.71 ERA, 8.9 strikeouts and 4.6 walks per nine innings. He’s a small right-hander with a big arm, having been clocked at over 100 mph in the past. He is coming back off of Tommy John surgery.

DeJesus has hit .231/.282/.277/.559 in 40 big league games over the last two years. Baseball America describes him as a potential second baseman who can also play third and short with a line drive swing and good on-base skills. The 2005 second-rounder is a career .297/.369/.389/.758 hitter in the minors.

Sands, 24, is hitting .244/.325/.376/.701 in 70 big league games over the last two years. He was hitting .303/.380/.531/.911 with 24 homers in the hitter-friendly Triple-A Pacific Coast League this year.

Loney, 28, will be a free agent after this season. The 28-year-old is hitting .254 with a .302 OBP, .344 slugging mark and .646 OPS along with four homers in 114 games. But presumably, the Red Sox would free enough cash in the transaction to pursue a free agent or a trade at the position in the offseason.

News of the framework for the potential blockbuster was first reported by Gordon Edes of ESPNBoston.com. Jon Paul Morosi of FoxSports.com was the first to report that cash would go from the Red Sox to the Dodgers.

Rob Bradford contributed to this report.

Read More: adrian gonzalez, allen webster, blockbuster, carl crawford Print  |  Email  |  Bark It Up!  |  Digg It
  • warminghut

    Exactly what free agent would the Sox pursue at first base? Or doesn’t that part actually matter to the story? Ty Wiggington? 

  • Jack Burton

    Free agency at all positions is pretty barren this year.  Of people you can sort of call first basemen, the only good ones are Napoli, Berkman, Swisher and Youkilis.  I’m not sure any of those are great fits.  I see a trade to address 1B.  I like the idea of all the financial flexibility, I just have no idea how they will reallocate those funds.  Considering the report that the Sox only pay $10Mish, and getting Rubby and Webster, I definitely like the deal, but two major holes just opened up at 1B and OF. 

  • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/ZVFM2HRNC5CTO2OUXD4XTX65O4 Dennis

     While I agree with the “big dump,” it’ll take time for the Sox to get respectable again. I looked at the 2013 free agent list and there’s not much of anything there. Looks like the Sox will have to count on a couple of “over the hill” veterans for a year or so, until someone in their vaunted(yeah right) minor league system steps up of reasonable free agents appear on the free agent list for 2014. Then again, could the “big dump” have anything to do with possible Sox plans to sell the team and get the hell out of town? 

  • anguillaman3

    I agree….looks like most fans are thrilled just to see a big move…to see these guys shipped out.  Everyone can agree that Beckett is not productive and that moving him for nothing in return is maybe addition by subtraction. I”m not so sure that moving AGON and Crawford and getting prospects in return will make the team better. I think Crawford will be a good player again…sure not what he was inked to..that was another dopey Theo move, ditto for AGON.  But don’t we want to see a better team rather than one that might be even worse. Again, folks the problem is with the starting pitching and has been for three years.

  • Terry Francona’s fault

    Great move

    Gonzalez seems to have an opinion on everything , and he lied about the cell phone incident with Kelly Shoppach .

  • Danielwhalen64

    It really doesn’t significantly matter to the story.  What matters is the sox freeing $262 million in payroll obligations.

  • rogerroger

    Then again, could the “big dump” have anything to do with possible Sox plans to sell the team and get the hell out of town?
    Lets hope so. 

  • Jimmy Piersall

    I thought that they might be able to move Gonzalez and make the team they were dealing with take Beckett as part of the deal   I never thought they’d get away from Crawford.  Who’s running the Dodgers…………Isaiah Thomas?

    To make the enima complete they should get rid of Dice-K, Lackey, and Lucchino.

  • Lyonspe

    This trade feels good just to get rid of Beckett. I couldn’t look at him for another two years. It was like divorcing your wife and having to live with her in the same house

  • Frozenrope26

    Dice-K is gone already after the season. Anyone feel like they are trying to  position themselves to trade for King Felix? That’s what I get out of this, other than a straight salary dump.

  • LovingThisMove

    Why are we dumping on senior management and ownership when they are doing exactly what we wanted them to do – only faster than we ever thought was possible?  We dump on Henry, but he was absolutely right about Crawford.  Maybe we’re just hating on Luchino? But if he is mister big free agent and brand and so on, then why are we dumping all our big name free agents?

    I think this ownership group fully understands the exact same thing we are seeing.  While they are not going to the media to say, “we have a crappy team and we’re going to fix it” — which many of us seem to want them to do — they are instead just doing it.

  • Fernjoe

    Say what you will about Cherington and Lucchino, if they pull off this deal, it will be a feather in their caps.  Getting rid of three of  Epstein’s mistakes in one deal is quite something.  Too bad Lackey couldn’t have been included.

    Big name overpaid players are not the answer.  Replacing the contributions of these players shouldn’t be too difficult.  It will be a pleasure NOT to see Beckett taking all that time on the mound between pitches or A-Gone running the bases.

  • Fernjoe

    Say what you will about Cherington and Lucchino, if they pull off this deal, it will be a feather in their caps.  Getting rid of three of  Epstein’s mistakes in one deal is quite something.  Too bad Lackey couldn’t have been included.

    Big name overpaid players are not the answer.  Replacing the contributions of these players shouldn’t be too difficult.  It will be a pleasure NOT to see Beckett taking all that time on the mound between pitches or A-Gone running the bases.

  • Fernjoe

    Finding someone who will hit 20 HR shouldn’t be that difficult.  Mauro Gomez could probably do it, but A-Gone’s defense might be a little harder to replace.

  • Fernjoe

    Finding someone who will hit 20 HR shouldn’t be that difficult.  Mauro Gomez could probably do it, but A-Gone’s defense might be a little harder to replace.

  • Anonymous

    Wow, and I thought other deals they made were awful. So we are giving up possibly a top ten offensive player in Adrian Gonzales, a dynamic player in Crawford, just to get rid of Beckett? I mean I want Beckett out badly but not at the cost of Crawford and Gonzales. 

    I liked the Crawford signing, even if they way overpaid for him, at least he is a player with potential, same for Gonzales. I would keep both of those guys, for one Crawford actually cares and Gonzales has the best swing I have seen since Manny left. I am sorry but this deal sucks for the Red Sox. If they make this we are back to finding a replacement for not signing Mark Texiera. We only have one middle of the lineup hitter in Adrian Gonzales and they want to get rid of him already? I know we have Ortiz but at some point Ortiz will fall off the map again, unless he and Bartolo are on the same workout plan. Just compare this deal to what we gave SD for Gonzales and tell me we aren’t getting hosed? Why do we want James Loney? The guy sucks, no thanks. You know you won a trade generally when you get the best player in the deal, the Red Sox in this deal aren’t getting anything known back in return. Basically two prospects one with health concerns and the other barely made the top 100 prospects list. Pathetic, just move Beckett for whatever you can get and live with it. Stop creating more problems trying to fix one.  

  • Anonymous

    Wow, and I thought other deals they made were awful. So we are giving up possibly a top ten offensive player in Adrian Gonzales, a dynamic player in Crawford, just to get rid of Beckett? I mean I want Beckett out badly but not at the cost of Crawford and Gonzales. 

    I liked the Crawford signing, even if they way overpaid for him, at least he is a player with potential, same for Gonzales. I would keep both of those guys, for one Crawford actually cares and Gonzales has the best swing I have seen since Manny left. I am sorry but this deal sucks for the Red Sox. If they make this we are back to finding a replacement for not signing Mark Texiera. We only have one middle of the lineup hitter in Adrian Gonzales and they want to get rid of him already? I know we have Ortiz but at some point Ortiz will fall off the map again, unless he and Bartolo are on the same workout plan. Just compare this deal to what we gave SD for Gonzales and tell me we aren’t getting hosed? Why do we want James Loney? The guy sucks, no thanks. You know you won a trade generally when you get the best player in the deal, the Red Sox in this deal aren’t getting anything known back in return. Basically two prospects one with health concerns and the other barely made the top 100 prospects list. Pathetic, just move Beckett for whatever you can get and live with it. Stop creating more problems trying to fix one.  

  • LovingThisMove

    With Gonzalez and Crawford, you can’t sign Ellsbury (although he is now on waivers).

    Crawford just showed you what he is — a .270/.300/.350 slap hitter whose sole skill was stealing bases.  He is now three years slower than his prime and getting slower.  Why do we want a slow, poor hitting, oft-injured, poor fielding left fielder for the next 6 years tying up $20 million per year?

    Gonzalez in the AL East, in Fenway, is at best a .300 hitter with a .900 OPS delivering 25 HRs and 100 RBIs, and bringing a Gold Glove at 1st.  Pretty good.  But is that worth $25 million per year?  And factor in that he is not a leader at all and a poor clubhouse guy to boot – remember his nonchalance at the end of last season? – coupled with his antagonism to management and ownership which won’t end (Shoppach is gone too!) – and you got to get rid of him.  He won’t be easily replaced, but it’s not like he is projecting to be a perennial All Star for us.  He’ll have much better luck in the NL – but don’t get fooled – he wouldn’t be able to do that here.

  • Anonymous

    Mike Napoli would be a good fit at 1B.

  • http://www.facebook.com/bryant.crawford1 Bryant Crawford

    Moyer, Wakefield, Clemens each pitches three. I’d pay for that, why not?

  • http://www.facebook.com/bryant.crawford1 Bryant Crawford

    kind of tell you how my life is going since BOBO. I am Sox/Dodgers fan. travel out there every summer since 1968. I was ecstatic when I heard the Sox dumped these guys then emtions turned when I heard to whom. It was like the night UBL was killed I thought they said Obama! Talk about 180 degrees in emotions  

  • Now it’s time to be fans again

    Let’s be clear – Gonzales, Crawford and Beckett are all great players. Beckett was an outstanding pitcher last year and will probably flourish in the National League, Gonzales has been on a tear since the All Star break, Crawford showed flashes of his old form in the month he played despite elbow pain, and even Punto is a useful utility player. West Coast Red Sox fans will tune in to see them and help refill Dodger stadium. Together with their earlier Ramirez trade, the Dodgers are turning themselves into the Lakers of baseball, the West Coast Yankees.

    So I applaud Cherington’s bold move, but let’s not pretend any of these players or contracts were as bad as they’ve come to seem since last September. This was a win-win if the Sox management can turn their new-found flexibility into WAR. In the meantime, their farm system has gotten better, but hasn’t benefited from years of losing and compensation like Baltimore and Tampa. An AL East wildcard is certainly not a lock.

    It’s going to be a long road. Cherington was listening to the fans, but baseball isn’t easy and the Sox aren’t going to start winning instantly. Can we stand behind this team and management, and stop talking about beer and chicken and the September collapse? Can we turn the page?

  • Allan from Millis

    nice deal.

  • Asantana1972

    Wow I can’t believe all these clowns in Sox nation !! R y’all serious in believing that upper mgnt is gonna be allow to spend that type of money again hahaha the real joke is on us as the fans . I will say its a sunny day in Cali and a dark day in REDSUX clubhouse with Bobby V as our future manger . This was what upper mgnt wanted to unload all these contracts one way or another to make them self not look bad by doing so , so they used this excuse but y’all will realize they ain’t gonna sign any key player and keep da money .. Fell well Sox nation we been screw once again and y’all think it’s for da better part ..

  • Zach Starzyk

    with this trade i feel like they’re getting rid of all the negative things that have happened the past two seasons and now the sox are really loaded in the farm system. the team is young for the most part and in free agency next year they’ll be alot more careful with the money spending. plus with all these high paid guys gone alot of the pressure is gone and we can see these young guys play and develop

  • Zach Starzyk

    thats a good idea, the sox have plenty of talent and potential in AA and AAA

  • Snidley

    Doesn’t matter who Sox pickup at first base.  Their first priority is to get the farm system back at its high level and focus on the starting pitching.  The main reason we are in this position is Lester and Beckett being “way” below 500 pitchers.  I do sense that we aren’t seeing the end yet.  I still would expect another blockbuster here to rid themselves of Lackey.  With Lackey out that would put a close to the Theo “insane” era or do I mean error :)

  • Snidley

    A lot of people are talking about a weak free agency, I wouldn’t worry about that as much as collecting the right talent.  Remember the cash being freed up helps the Sox for “trades” too.  The moves aren’t just about “buying” themselves back into a race as much as admitting that this group of “players” would have been a disaster long term.  I for one would rather them show progress next year and have cash at mid season next year.  The tables in baseball can turn “real” fast.

  • Patsox

    Baseball has changed. You have to build a team through young talent (Nationals, Angels with Trout). The days of spending big money on free agents and buying a WS are over.

  • xo45thvols

    “Can we turn the page?” Probably not any time soon. Too many fans are still upset about 2011 to let it slide that easily. Although, most of those fans are probably pink hat bandwagon jumpers, so there’s still a chance.

  • Slede

    Is NESN going to carry the Dodger games now.

  • Beccadmg1

    glad to get away from crawford and beckett . might miss gonzo his attitude was questionable .hope sox sign elesbury to a long term contract  the team is moving forward lets see what next year brings rest papi for next season  go patriots

  • ryan

    Still waiting for Speier and Bradford to acknowledge their complicity in perpetuating the myths of Beckett and Epstein as one the hand a workhorse who always gives his all and on the other a boy genius of a general manager.  

  • Slothman555

    so i told them dogers u can hav gonzalez but  gotta take beckett and crawford too……. AND THEY DID

  • Garyritter

    Amazing to see how the Red Sox brass spins a major salary and talent dump into a good thing.Looks to me like they have added 40M to their profit line with no immediate plan to make the club better

  • Anonymous

    Yeah, well you are right. I was wrong, after thinking about this for awhile I change my mind. I like the deal, it is going to allow them to rebuild. I did want them to get rid of Beckett, the guy was one of the main problems they had. If they can get rid of John Lackey, Bobby V, and maybe even Larry Lucchino (his contract is up for renewal anyways, so just don’t renew it) then the clean sweep should be complete. Or just take Larry’s ability to make baseball decisions away and let him focus on selling crap.  

    I was thinking about next season, what I should have been considering is two years down the line. As long as they do not repeat the same mistakes of the past few years (like sign a Josh Hamilton or a Greinke). I think they have an opportunity now to build this team to be a winner again. I will deal with another bridge year if it means a solid baseball team for the future. They do seem to have a lot of young talent in the organization. 

    Could we see an Ellsbury and whatever else it takes deal for King Felix? Would Seattle want Ellsbury or would it have to be a three team deal sending Ellsbury somewhere else to get prospects Seattle wants? 

    For the first time in a while I can see the light at the end of the tunnel for this team. 

  • Yoooukindoeet

    Bring Youk back!

Red Sox Box Score
Red Sox Schedule
Baseball Analytics Blog
Red Sox Headlines
Red Sox Minor League News
Red Sox Team Leaders
MLB Headlines
Tips & Feedback

Verify