Full Count
A Furiously Updated Red Sox Blog
WEEI.com Blog Network
The age and risk of the Josh Hamilton class, ages 32-36 12.13.12 at 4:27 pm ET
By

Josh Hamilton

A few days ago, we offered this column on Josh Hamilton and the likelihood of diminishing returns in the fourth year of a contract. In light of the fact that the 31-year-old (who will turn 32 early next season) signed a five-year, $125 million deal with the Angels, it seemed appropriate to update the numbers to examine the standard performance of comparable hitters as 36-year-olds (Hamilton’s playing age in the fifth year of a deal), particularly given that, as Rob Bradford reported, the Sox were only interested in Hamilton on a deal of three or fewer years.

Hamilton is the 60th player since 1901 with an OPS+ (meaning OPS compared to league average but adjusted for park, with 100 representing 100 percent of league average, and 130 representing a player who is 30 percent better than average) of between 130 and 140 during his age 27-31 seasons and at least 100 homers during that time. As a group, his predecessors have seen their OPS+ drop from an average of 135 to 122 between ages 32-34 to 111 at age 35 before bumping back up to 114 at age 36.

However, the availability of those players into their mid-30s has seen considerable declines. While there were 60 players in the initial “Hamilton class” between ages 27-31, there were just 38 players who remained active at age 36. Meanwhile, of those who did play at age 36, those 38 players averaged 391 plate appearances, broken down as follows:

500-plus plate appearances: 12

400-499 plate appearances: 9

300-399 plate appearances: 4

200-299 plate appearances: 7

100-199 plate appearances: 3

1-99 plate appearances: 3

So, of the 60 original members of the Hamilton group, and excluding the six who remain active but younger than 36, just 38.9 percent have been healthy and productive enough to claim as many as 400 plate appearances at age 36. Players who are elite in their primes tend to remain productive (albeit considerably less so, and with far less power) as they age into their mid-30s, but their ability to stay on the field at age 35 and 36 tends to drop precipitously, to the point of creating the possibility of a very expensive contract albatross.

Here’s the breakdown of hitters in the Hamilton class:

Read More: 2012 Hot Stove, Josh Hamilton, Print  |  Email  |  Bark It Up!  |  Digg It
  • Chonor0713

    Who cares it’s all about winning now.  If they get 3 good years out of him an 2 world series rings it was worth it.

    • Brian

      Sounds like a sustainable long term strategy.  Perhaps they can deal their entire farm system for Roy Halladay and Cliff Lee, because who really cares about the long term success of the franchise when you can improve next year’s team on paper, right?  I mean, I LOVE TEH BIG NAMES.

  • Pip

    It’s TV contract money they’re spending. They don’t have to earn it with ticket sales,etc. It’s already there.
    Fox expects their LA teams will make a serious effort at winning the playoffs so they can get their money back in ratings and advertising. Welcome to the new wide world of sports dominated by TV contracts.

  • anguillaman3

    The difference really is simple, Hamilton is an elite player….GOMES, VICTORINO…and Napoli are not ELITE..in fact the combined HR production next season of GOMES, Victorino and Napoli is unlikely to match that of Hamilton….nuff said., let’s not compare apples to oranges.

  • Bruinman86

    Too many years.  I would have been nervous about 4 years.  The injury bug is another worry.  Looks like the Angels have lost their way and, much like the Dodgers, trying to make the same mistake the Sox, Mets and Yanks did. There really wasn’t anyone in the free agent market I really liked other than Hunter.  I Don’t expect the sox to be all that much better this year, so hopefully it means they will draft high and get some young, skilled future players/trade bait.

  • Ryan

    I remember when Speier said it was a good thing to sign Beckett because he’s such a workhorse.  Oh, and Buchholz is a real gem too.  Whoever thinks he knows what he’s talking about isn’t living in reality either. I don’t care where he went to school, as if people there learn anything these days anyway.

    • Elaine_Apthorp

      Um, Buhcholz IS a very talented pitcher and Beckett WAS a workhorse for most of his career. And why on earth are you ranting about where the columnist went to school?  The questionable sense of reality does not appear to be Mr. Speier’s. Many of us Sox fans have incredibly short memories and a marked tendency toward bipolar hysteria. As a region we need better meds.

      • Ryan

         Yes, that Buchholz, he’s got all the potential in the world if only his scrawny body doesn’t break down again after 80 or so innings.  And Beckett, maybe was a workhorse when he was 20, but never with the Sox, which was when Speier was shilling for him and writing b.s. columns based on what his laptop tells him.  As for Harvard, you must never listen to Speier’s appearances on WEEI.  Everytime they introduce him as “the smartest guy at WEEI”, and then proceed to state how we was chess club captain at Harvard or whatever.  Just read his columns and you will see that quantity is no indication of quality, just as where your diploma says you went to school is no indication of native intelligence.  Get back to me when good ol’ Clay wins more than 10 games again, when Theo works his magic in Chicago, and when Alex Speier gives some evidence of having real baseball acumen.  I mean, don’t you think if people were really interested in what he had to say there would be more than 9 comments in one day?  Not a very good return on investment I’d say.

  • Jjddc1

    Its just a numbers crunch to soothe the Sox fans for not getting him.  I agree, first 3 years should be good, but last 2 hard to say.  At least their commitment is there.  Same with the Dodgers.  Lots of money spent, but a commitment.  This team is not going to be exciting, and we are placing too much hope on guys in the AA & AAA that are going to be good.  Very few really pan out.

  • Ipse Amicus

    He was worth the risk. His numbers are huge.  He explains, more than anything,,Texas was so good after he got there – and why Texas might not be so good now that he is gone. 

Red Sox Box Score
Red Sox Schedule
Baseball Analytics Blog
Red Sox Headlines
Down on the Farm
Red Sox Minor League News
Red Sox Team Leaders
MLB Headlines
Tips & Feedback

Verify