Full Count
A Furiously Updated Red Sox Blog
WEEI.com Blog Network
Terry Francona on Big Show: ‘I actually think they’re really good owners’ 01.23.13 at 6:22 pm ET
By Alex Speier
Terry Francona managed the Sox for eight years. (AP)

Terry Francona discussed his feelings about Red Sox owners on The Big Show. (AP)

Former Red Sox and current Indians manager Terry Francona, in an interview on WEEI’s Big Show on Wednesday afternoon to discuss his new book (“Francona: The Red Sox Years”), co-authored with Dan Shaughnessy, suggested that while he was unhappy with the fashion in which his Sox career came to an end after eight years, he still believes the Red Sox have a strong ownership group. While he suggested in the book that the group of principal owner John Henry, chairman Tom Werner and CEO Larry Lucchino represent a group that likes but does not love the game, he said that he did not mean for that statement to come across as disrespectful.

“I think they’re real good owners. In fact, I said that in the book. I wouldn’t have written the script – the way it ended, I wouldn’t have written it for me, personally. That doesn’t mean they’re not good owners,” said Francona. “I actually think they’re really good owners. I was disappointed in some of the things, in my communications with them, I was very disappointed. That doesn’t mean they’re not good people or good owners.

“Where some people said it was critical, I didn’t view it that way. I think I went out of my way and called them good owners. They’re not bad people. I had some issues with the way some things were handled. That doesn’t mean they’re bad people nor does it mean they’re bad owners,” he added. “I don’t think that’s saying anything that is disrespectful. … They’ve come in the game and they’re going to leave the game. This is what I’m going to do the rest of my life. I also said in that statement that they’re very good owners. I don’t view that as disrespectful.”

In the book, Francona did suggest that there were times when the team seemed to place greater emphasis on marketing and revenues than winning, as when the team flew back-and-forth across the country to play an exhibition game in Arizona prior to the 2005 season, when the team opened the 2008 campaign in Japan and when batting practice turned into something of a circus as throngs of fans started standing on the warning track between the dugouts.

All of that said, whereas former GM Theo Epstein described the emergence of a “Monster” that started to influence the team’s roster decisions and put a premium on “name” players (as when the team added first baseman Adrian Gonzalez and outfielder Carl Crawford in December 2010), Francona said that to his knowledge, personnel decisions were driven by a desire to win.

“I don’t’ think we ever brought players in because of ['the Monster]. I think they wanted to improve the ratings and things like that. They did some surveys. But I know Theo always tried to bring in players he thought could win. That was what our job was,” said Francona. “When they asked me a question, going to Japan, or going to Phx to play an exhibition game, I wanted to give an opinion based on winning baseball games.”

Among the other topics addressed by Francona:

On whether he knows the identity of the individuals in the Red Sox organization who leaked personal information about his last year in Boston after his dismissal: “I actually don’t. I stopped trying. I stopped trying because you hear too much stuff. It wasn’t helpful. It wasn’t helping me get over and get past it. I think there are a lot of people with the Red Sox trying to find out a lot of stuff. It wasn’t doing me any good and it wasn’t healthy, so I just stopped.”

On whether it will be awkward to interact with Red Sox owners: “I don’t know. I haven’t really talked to them anyway. It probably would be a little awkward. … Larry Lucchino, when I got the job in Cleveland, sent me a real nice text message. When they hired John Farrell, I sent him one back. I think Larry likes a good fight. You can throw a punch at him and he’ll throw one back, and the next day you’ll wake up and he’s good to go. I’ve always kind of admired that about him. The other guys, I haven’t really talked to anyway, so I don’t know how it will be.”

On whether he will have a relationship with Red Sox owners going forward: “Probably not. John stopped answering my emails and stuff like that a long time ago. Probably not. I’m not really sure why that happened, but it did, so you move on.”

On his suggestions to Doc Rivers early in 2011 that something was missing with a roster that appeared loaded: “I just never felt, the ’11 team, we never got that personality, that stuff you’re just dying for as a team. We had talent, and that showed for a while, but we never had that team that cared about each other on the field. That was right from the beginning. We worked at it as a stuff. We just never got there. That fell on me. That’s why I was disappointed in myself.”

To listen to the complete interview, click here. For complete Red Sox coverage, visit weei.com/redsox.

Print  |  Email  |  Bark It Up!  |  Digg It
  • Mole

    move on, nitwit

  • Richard in Canton

    Tito was by far the best manager this team ever had.  These owners brought us the only 2 world series victories in our lifetime.  Those are the facts.  They may have lost there way in the last couple of years and we may be destined to a 4th place finish this year,but the facts do not change.  Good luck to Tito and the Indians. 

  • Donalmcl27

    Beginning to sound like Portia Faces Life, stay tuned for tomorrow’s comments.

  • Boston_Sports

    Ownership has lost its way for years. I appreciate the two world series but things have really fallen apart for several years. I sense they have lost and interest in real baseball and are only concerned about marketing the team and its products for profit only.

  • MarvinMarchant

    They gave an aging outfielder 13 mil per because he’s marketable.. Zero baseball knowledge from these clueless aholes. 

  • Linda Austin

    Tito is showing us his true colors. His book is a hatchet job aimed at Sox ownership but now he’s not man enough to publicly acknowledge and discuss what he actually wrote in the book.
    So weak.
    Go away Tito.

  • The Oddsbreaker

    It’s kinda funny how the real face of The Dark Side is coming to light, I can picture Lucchino with a Black Hooded Cape barking orders from behind his Death Star Mahogany Desk,Friendly Fenway dosn’t sound so fun anymore….
    Good Luck to Tito and The Indians

  • http://www.facebook.com/pete.lincoln.338 Pete Lincoln

    Only halfway through the book but I have yet to see anything resembling a hatchet job.  I guess the best stuff is at the end but even the excerpts seem rather tame.

    I have to imagine his new bosses don’t want him fueling the fire, so Tito is trying to keep things low key.  After all, MLB owners are a fraternity, and the Indians and Red Sox do business from time to time via trades, and it’s not really in Titos DNA to go off on people.

    The only harsh thing I have read in the book so far is he was ticked off his closer had mustard on his uniform with the Phillies when called on to make a save, apparently he had been chowing down on some hot dogs during the game.

  • Linda Austin

    You bought the book??  ha ha ha ha ha   Poor dear.

  • fredinhope

    If I’m the Indians, I tell him he’s expending all his energy on the wrong team.

  • AL34

    They must have something on Tito so Sox Management told him to knock it iff or they would leak it out. Someon always has leverage in someone in this world and thats how the world turns.

  • Anonymous

    tito, forget the past and look to the future.

Red Sox Box Score
Red Sox Schedule
Baseball Analytics Blog
Red Sox Headlines
Red Sox Minor League News
Red Sox Team Leaders
MLB Headlines
Tips & Feedback

Verify