Full Count
A Furiously Updated Red Sox Blog
WEEI.com Blog Network
Posts related to ‘barry bonds’
Closing Time: Another home run for David Ortiz, but Indians cruise past Henry Owens, Red Sox 10.02.15 at 10:12 pm ET
By   |  Comments Off on Closing Time: Another home run for David Ortiz, but Indians cruise past Henry Owens, Red Sox
David Ortiz follows through on his 37th homer in Friday's loss. (Jason Miller/Getty Images)

David Ortiz follows through on his 37th homer in Friday’s loss. (Jason Miller/Getty Images)

David Ortiz just keeps making history.

The Red Sox designated hitter isn’t letting age slow him, not by a long shot. On Friday night against the Indians, Ortiz blasted his 37th home run of the season, a two-run shot in the fourth that accounted for all of the Red Sox scoring in an 8-2 loss in Cleveland.

Ortiz had already become just the second player ever to hit 30 homers and drive in at least 100 runs at age 39 or later. Barry Bonds, who went 45-101 in 2004, is the other.

He simply added to those totals on Friday, with his season numbers now standing at 37 homers and 107 driven in. If Ortiz can hit three more home runs over the final two games of the season — a tall order, to be sure — he’ll join Bonds and Hank Aaron as the only 39-year-olds to hit 40 homers. He also needs six RBIs to tie Paul Molitor’s record for most RBIs (113) for a player 39 or older.

Ortiz wasn’t even necessarily supposed to play on Friday. A night earlier, interim manager Torey Lovullo had suggested that Ortiz wouldn’t play again this season. He certainly had nothing left to prove. But Ortiz had other ideas.

“It really wasn’t anything pressing, to be honest with you,” Lovullo told reporters in Cleveland before the game. “I just asked him how he felt, he said, ‘I’m ready to go.’ That was really it. Maybe I gave you guys the wrong impression, which I apologize for. All along, we were going to re-evaluate where he was at today and just talk it over and see how he felt.

“Obviously, he wants to play. The best part about David are the things nobody knows about. He wants to play for all the right reasons. He wants to play to win a game. He wants to play to do well. He wants to play to show his younger teammates that this is what a championship-style player does. It speaks volumes about his character, that he is here to play.”

The rest of the game didn’t go so well for the Red Sox or rookie left-hander Henry Owens, who got knocked around before being knocked out in the fifth. Owens allowed 10 hits and seven runs in 4 1/3 innings, walking four, striking out four, and struggling with his command.

Owens finishes his rookie campaign with a 4-4 record and 4.57 ERA.

The Indians put this one away with four in the third and three in the fifth. Carlos Santana struck the big blow, a three-run double with one out in the third.

With the loss, the Red Sox (78-82) are guaranteed to finish the season with a losing record.

Read More: barry bonds, David Ortiz, Indians, Red Sox
Pedro Martinez among headliners on HOF ballot announced Monday 11.24.14 at 12:36 pm ET
By   |  Comments Off on Pedro Martinez among headliners on HOF ballot announced Monday
Pedro Martinez is one of the leading candidates on the Hall of Fame ballot that was announced Monday. (Jim Rogash/Getty Images)

Pedro Martinez is one of the leading candidates on the Hall of Fame ballot that was announced Monday. (Jim Rogash/Getty Images)

The Hall of Fame ballot announced Monday includes a trio of standout pitchers, including Red Sox legend Pedro Martinez, who should take headlines back from the stars who were tainted by Major League Baseball‘s steroid era.

Joining Martinez as first-time candidates are five-time Cy Young Award winner Randy Johnson, who amassed 4,875 career strikeouts (second only to Nolan Ryan), and Braves legend John Smoltz, who is the only pitcher to record 200 wins and 150 saves.

Martinez, who won two Cy Youngs, compiled a 219-100 career record with 3,154 strikeouts.

Former Red Sox shortstop Nomar Garciaparra also makes his first appearance on the ballot.

Roger Clemens, Barry Bonds, Mark McGwire and Sammy Sosa — all linked to the use of performance-enhancing drugs — are back. Clemens and Bonds both received 35 percent of the votes last year, well below the number needed for admission. McGwire dipped to 11 percent, and he only has two more years of candidacy. Sosa fell to 7 percent last year, and if he dips below 5 percent he’ll be removed from future ballots.

Results will be announced Jan. 6. The induction ceremony is scheduled for July 26.

Read More: barry bonds, john smoltz, Nomar Garciaparra, pedro martinez
Curt Schilling on D&C: Playing Jonny Gomes over Daniel Nava doesn’t make sense 10.30.13 at 11:15 am ET
By   |  73 Comments

ESPN’€™s Curt Schilling joined Dennis & Callahan on Wednesday and voiced his opinion on some of Red Sox manager John Farrell‘€™s decisions this World Series, and he tried to explain why St. Louis pitched to David Ortiz in Game 5.

Farrell announced on Tuesday that, with the return of Shane Victorino to right field, Jonny Gomes would receive the start in left field over Daniel Nava in Game 6 on Wednesday at Fenway Park. Schilling said, ‘€œNo, not at all,’€ does starting Gomes over Nava make sense to him.

‘€œI love Daniel Nava, I think the kid is just a complete player,’€ Schilling said. ‘€œI think that the Gomes thing is exactly what John said — I think it’€™s a hunch, and he’€™s continuing to play it.’€

Schilling also questioned Farrell’s decision-making throughout the series.

‘€œI thought John had made some questionable moves and changes, and I thought got outmanaged a couple of different times,’€ Schilling said. ‘€œThey’€™re playing poorly, but they’€™re good enough to play around that. I guess they’€™re one of the few teams that can do that.’€

If not for Ortiz, the Red Sox likely would find themselves in a significantly different situation. St. Louis continues to pitch to Ortiz despite the fact he possesses a .733/750/1.267 batting line, with four extra-base hits in five games.

‘€œThe problem is that he’€™s so locked in, it’€™s very Barry Bonds-like in the sense that when he was going well, he would literally get one pitch, not an at-bat, a game, and when he got it he would never miss it. David is getting a pitch an at bat and he’€™s not missing it,’€ Schilling said.

Read the rest of this entry »

Read More: barry bonds, Curt Schilling, daniel nava, David Ortiz
Pedro Martinez on Big Show: ‘Sad’ that potential Hall of Famers Barry Bonds, Roger Clemens ‘did something wrong’ 01.24.13 at 11:56 pm ET
By   |  9 Comments

Three-time Cy Young winner Pedro Martinez, in an interview on WEEI’s Big Show to discuss his hiring by the Red Sox as a special assistant to the GM, was asked for his reaction to the idea that some of his most dominating contemporaries — players like Roger Clemens, Barry Bonds and Sammy Sosa who have been connected to performance-enhancing drugs — were not elected to the Hall of Fame in 2012, their first year of eligibility.

“It makes me sad to see that such names in baseball did not get elected the way they should have because of different situations that they faced in their careers,” said Martinez. “Those are people that I admired, that I respected, that I competed against and it’€™s sad that they couldn’€™t quite see the end of their career finish up the way that everybody expected. At the same time, everybody has to carry the responsibility that they have the best way possible. Everybody is going to be held accountable for the things that we do.

“I respect the way the writers go about their business. My duty was to perform the best way possible. I did it. I did it clean. I’€™m not saying anybody else did it, because I didn’€™t see them, but obviously the writers that have the right to vote must have big reasons why they didn’€™t vote. It’€™s actually sad for baseball to see that probably some of the biggest players ever in the history of the game could not be elected because they did something wrong.” Read the rest of this entry »

Read More: barry bonds, hall of fame, pedro martinez, Roger Clemens
Curt Schilling on D&C: Hall of Fame shutout ‘one of the prices’ all players paid for failure to address steroids 01.10.13 at 10:16 am ET
By   |  6 Comments

Retired Red Sox pitcher Curt Schilling, in an interview on Dennis & Callahan on Thursday morning, said that the collective decision by Hall of Fame voters to not elect a single player to Cooperstown this year was a clear consequence of the failure by players in the era in which he played to police the use of performance-enhancing drugs in the game. (To listen to the complete interview, click here.)

“I think, with a few exceptions, nobody knows [who used performance-enhancing drugs], so the whole lot of us are lumped in together. Nobody knows,” said Schilling. “We didn’€™t do anything about it. At the end of the day, we didn’€™t do anything about it. We knew about it. I think we all had an idea, a really strong suspicion, but we didn’€™t do anything about it. And we sat by, and we turned a blind eye, and I think this is one of the prices that we ended up paying.”

Asked what he would have done differently if he could have had the opportunity to revisit the era when steroid use was rampant, Schilling did not hesitate.

“I think I would have reacted to the first time [former pitcher and leading Players’ Association member] Rick Helling stood up in a player’€™s union meeting and said what are we going to do about testing? And I think there were a lot of players who wanted to react,” said Schilling. “But I think it was one of those things, like everything else that comes from being in a game mentality, you’€™re afraid to go against the stream. And I think that’€™s one of the last times in my life that I didn’€™t.”

Schilling said that, if he were entrusted with a vote, he wouldn’t vote for players who cheated by using performance-enhancing drugs. At the same time, he acknowledged that, from the vantage point of history, it’s problematic that players such as Barry Bonds and Roger Clemens (as well as Pete Rose, who is banned from baseball — and hence, from Hall of Fame consideration — after gambling on the sport) do not have places in Cooperstown. Read the rest of this entry »

Read More: barry bonds, Curt Schilling, Greg Maddux, Phillies
Gammons Talks McGwire, Red Sox on D&C 01.12.10 at 11:35 am ET
By   |  110 Comments

Hall of Famer Peter Gammons of the MLB Network and NESN joined the Dennis & Callahan Show on Tuesday morning to discuss Mark McGwire’s admission that he used steroids for most of his career. Gammons looked at how the issue of performance-enhancing drugs will affect the legacies of McGwire, Roger Clemens, Barry Bonds and others. He also concluded by offering his assessment of the shape of the 2010 Red Sox, whom he believes will be better than the 2009 team.

A transcript is below. To listen to the interview, click here.

How many steps forward versus backwards did Mark McGwire take?

They eliminated doubt, which is I guess a good thing. I found it ‘€“ I don’€™t know how you found it ‘€“ but I found it sad in a lot of ways. I watch some of these guys, and I think about Clemens and some of these other people, there’€™s a delusion there. I couldn’€™t believe that McGwire kept saying that he has the God-given ability to hit home runs. Now, when he was at USC, I can remember the late, great Red Sox scout Joe Stevenson calling me up and saying, ‘€˜Mark McGwire is going to be one of the greatest home run hitters of all time.’€™ Yes, he hit 49 home runs as a rookie. Yes, he had all those injuries with the plantar fasciitis and all that. But to say it’€™s only health reasons ‘€“ the fact is, a lot of people took steroids so that they could work out eight hours a day and get bigger. I think it really hurt him in the eyes, not of people who vote for the Hall of Fame, but in public opionion. For him to say that his home run numbers, the fact that he has the greatest home runs per at-bat ratio of anyone in baseball history, had nothing to do with steroids, I think it hurt him terribly. I think a lot of us were just going, ‘€˜Please, don’€™t say that.’€™

It was like he was trying to accomplish forgiveness and legitimacy for his career. Those two things seem mutually exclusive.

I agree. I know from talking to guys like Mike Holliday, the Duncan brothers, Skip Schumaker, McGwire would take them into the house in the winter and work with them and coach. He loves that. I really believe that first and foremost he wants to come back and teach and share. He was a very intelligent hitter by the end of his career. I know he wants to share that. Matt Holliday,the stories that he tells about McGwire are tremendous. I think he kind of realizes in the deeper recesses of his mind that his chances of making the Hall of Fame are probably slight. He probably felt, ‘€˜Well, if I confess, maybe.’€™ But I think he dug himself a bigger whole with this ‘€“ the whole denial thing. I remember, was it two years ago that Clemens was in front of Congress? I said to Mark Shapiro, I was watching a game in Winter Haven, we were talking about Clemens. I said, ‘€˜Actually, watching him, I think he believes that he never did anything, that he’€™s completely innocent.’€™ Mark said, ‘€˜Well, Psychology 7 will tell you: people who are self-absorbed often become self-delusional.’€™ I think that’€™s happened to a lot of these baseball players, because steroids seem to be so important.

He said he did it for his health, but when he started doing steroids, he started getting hurt every year, and he had no answer for that contradiction.

Absolutely. And he didn’€™t tie, from 1993-94 to 1998, he didn’€™t tie that. He left strings unattached there that lead a lot of us to say, ‘€˜Ah.’€™ I’€™ve spent a lot of time with him over his career. I must say, I really like him. In ‘€™98, I was with him for about five days in St. Louis. They had just lost five games in a row. Todd Stottlemyre went out, knocked down the first two hitters and threw a shutout. McGwire hit a home run in the eighth inning to make it 6-0 from 5-0. Afterwards, everyone wanted to talk to McGwire and he said, ‘€˜My home run is meaningless. Todd Stottlemyre just saved the team.’€™ There were other things like that. For instance, when he broke Maris’€™ record, he was up there, they had that stage after the game at Busch Stadium. Up there, it was McGwire, his son, his ex-wife, and his ex-wife’€™s husband up on the podium with him. I remember saying to Dan Patrick, we were doing something in the studio at ESPN, I said, ‘€˜The great thing about that is that Mark McGwire sent a message to everybody in this country who’€™s divorced that, in the end, it’€™s all about the kids.’€™ He still had that very good relationship with the ex-wife’€™s husband, just because he wanted his son to have the sense of normalcy. There were a lot of things like that. I remember one time in ‘€™96, doing a long interview with him, all of a sudden he started trashing himself for the way his first marriage ended. He was on camera just ripping himself. I was thinking, ‘€˜You know, this guy is really a decent human being.’€™ But now, when he gets up on this stage, ‘€˜Okay, I want to be forgiven,’€™ he lost that humanity that he showed so many times in his life. It made me very sad. It really did.

We know what we think we know ‘€“ there’€™s the statistical evidence of the frequency of his home runs, and the anecdotal evidence of the distance of those home runs. Was there anecdotal evidence that he was hitting the ball further than anyone else in history?

I don’€™t always trust those trackers of where home runs go, but yes, there was enough evidence to say he hit the ball further than anybody, with the possible exception of Canseco around ‘€™89 or ‘€™92. ‘€¦ It really does bother me that a Bonds or a Clemens, who were clearly Hall of Fame players, that we’€™re so insecure and so frail we have to go somewhere else. That’€™ss human nature. Trying to sit through and spend an hour trying to interview Alex Rodriguez last February taught me something for the rest of my life, that the bigger they are, the frailer they are. I actually like him much more because of that. I’€™ve talked to him a lot about how he basically addressed himself, was hyperventilating and everything else. It’€™s odd to me that so many athletes are so insecure. I remember guys on the Orioles telling me that the most insecure guy they ever met was Cal Ripken. Maybe that is all part of greatness. As we sit down and read Game Change in the next week, maybe we’€™ll find the same thing about Bill Clinton.

TJ Quinn listed all the steroids that McGwire used. He talked to players who said that McGwire was one of the big proponents of steroids, how to use them and how to stack them. Did you ever hear anything along those lines?

No, but I wouldn’€™t be surprised. We do know that when he got to the major leagues, that Jason Giambi hooked onto Mark McGwire as his mentor, as his best friend and all the rest. TJ had done the work for the Daily News, where they linked the drug dealer in Michigan down to Southern California. We were talking about this on MLB the other night. ‘€¦ He was never suspended. He was never in the Mitchell Report. There was the Daily News link, but McGwire had kind of stayed away from it. All we had was what our eyes told us, and that can be deceiving. There are examples of people who either got smaller, like Jeff Bagwell because he had the arthritic shoulder and couldn’€™t lift a weight in five years, or some other guys who maybe just naturally got bigger. But the whole McGwire thing has seemed so much larger than life. That one piece that TJ did, I thought, pretty much convinced us that he was guilty. Now, of course he’€™s admitted it. I believe his timeframe. That’€™s probably true. I think some of the testimony he gave about how much he did in ‘€™89, ‘€™90, I’€™m not sure how accurate that is.

The whole Hall of Fame question is an interesting one. I know that some of my sabermetric friends believe that this is all irrelevant, that it doesn’€™t matter who took steroids and who didn’€™t. I don’€™t agree with that. I do very strongly believe that once baseball finally had drug testing in 2004, that anyone who violates the drug policy and is caught is automatically disqualified from the Hall of Fame. ‘€¦

The Hall of Fame is not a right. It’€™s an honor. Should we honor people that essentially cheated? Somebody said to me, ‘€˜It wasn’€™t illegal.’€™ Yeah, but it was in federal law.

So to your mind, Manny is out for the Hall of Fame?

I think Manny and Palmeiro. A-Rod was before testing, before 2004. That was the 2003 random testing that was supposed to be anonymous. But I think that Palmeiro and Manny, I don’€™t think they have a chance of ever making the Hall of Fame.

Does your viewpoint change if they haven’€™t tested positive in Major League Baseball? We know what we think about Bonds and Clemens. Will our views soften over the decades based on who they are and what they meant to the game?

I think they may. We do have those issues. Last spring, Mike Piazza walked up to me and said, ‘€˜Can you believe that because of the acne on my back, that I did steroids?’€™ There are so many players that we think may have done [steroids] but we don’€™t know, whether it’€™s Pudge Rodriguez or whoever. It’€™s a hard thing to live down. I think it would be nice if we had more tests, proof, if we had more ways to judge players. I go back to Bagwell. If you take Bagwell’€™s home runs, RBIs, runs, extra-base hits, OPS, OPS+, slugging, Gold Gloves, Jim Rice is close to Jeff Bagwell in one statistical category. Yet that question will be raised for him when he goes up in front of the Hall of Fame next year. I’€™ve talked a lot to his best friend, Brad Ausmus, about it. Brad has sworn up and down, there’€™s no way that Bagwell did it. But just the notion of it. If Jeff Bagwell is completely innocent but he’€™s punished because other people flew under the radar, that’€™s kind of a sad story.

Could Clemens ever do what McGwire did in offering a confession?

No. I thought McGwire was stilted. It wasn’€™t the personality that I knew on the field or in the clubhouse. But I think Roger is too programmed and too stubborn. I think it would be very difficult. I think he’ll have to do it at some point in his life, but I shudder to think what would happen. I think it could turn into a disaster.

Last time he attempted to tell his side of the story, it was laughable.

It was. That whole question, I actually had a friend who was finishing her PhD in psychology at Boston College, and we used to talk about it in the gym all the time. She used to say, that business of going from self-absorbed to self-delusional is really the essence of most psychology courses. Maybe a lot of these guys will never come out of it. It may be, if ‘€“ I was going to say Pudge Rodriguez, but he might pull the Sammy Sosa stance and say, ‘€˜I don’€™t speak English any more; I only speak English when I sign my contracts’€™ ‘€“ we’€™re still a long way. We were looking at the list of guys coming up in the next few years. Juan Gonzalez is on the list next year. Sooner or later, Pudge is going to come up. Sosa is going to come up. This debate is not going away. I think it’€™s great that McGwire tipped his hat to Bud Selig and the testing policy, that he laid down behind it. That’€™s a good thing. But still, the question remains, if indeed the Hall of Fame is the highest honor a player can get, and since it’€™s not a right but an honor, should these guys be put in the Hall of Fame. I think it’€™s an issue, it’€™s not a statistical right. Ken Rosenthal the other night pulled out the ballot and read the lines about character. It is something we have to think about.

If he hadn’€™t done steroids, would McGwire be anything close to a Hall of Fame player? Without steroids, he had no chance. What would vote for Bonds and Clemens?

Right now, given the evidence, probably no in both cases. And I believe very strongly that Bonds was a Hall of Famer before 1999. What it does to the game ‘€“ and I think Jayson Stark wrote about it very well, what McGwire ignores is what the disillusionment about 1998 means to the sport. I think that’€™s important. I know the other day, when Tom [Verducci] and Kenny [Rosenthal] and I were talking about the question, Bonds and A-Rod and Clemens all would have been Hall of Famers without steroids. McGwire would go to the Hall of Fame based on power numbers. But I’€™m not sure it’€™s that simple.

Why would you want to reward players for greed?

The insecurities of these guys, the frailties. I joke about it all the time, I wish that William Shakespeare were around right now to cover this era. That’€™s what he was writing about. The insecurity that these guys have is just remarkable to me, that need to somehow be perfect. And I really found that in Alex [Rodriguez] ‘€“ his need to make people believe that he was perfect on the field and off. Now, people knowing he wasn’€™t, he was a totally different guy this [past] year. He seemed so much more relaxed, so much happier [after admitting steroid use in an interview with Gammons before the season]. He understood, you know what? It’€™s about team.

What was interesting last night, when we were doing MLB, Costas was asked, what was McGwire like after the interview? Bob said nothing basically changed. He wasn’€™t any different. But after I finished the Rodriguez interview last spring, he came back before I left, and chatted. He said, ‘€˜I hope this frees me. I hope that now I can just go on and be a human being and stop pretending.’€™ I think he got it. He got what he went through. You understood that he was wrong, and I think he understood and I know he understands now, there’€™s no need to be perfect. Just be a baseball player. Derek Jeter‘€™s not perfect, but people love Derek Jeter. I think Alex learned something from that. I’€™m not sure these other guys have learned anything from it.

Did you predict that Adrian Beltre would hit more homers than Jason Bay?

Yes, playing in Fenway Park with that lineup, as opposed to Jason Bay in the Mets lineup, yeah, I did.

What do you think for Beltre? Forty homers?

Thirty, 32.

Bay won’€™t hit 30?

Not in that ballpark.

What about Cameron?

.270, 25 homers, and the best thing about him is the way he absolutely killed ‘€“ what was it, a .954 OPS against left-handers the last five years? He does absolutely kill left-handed pitchers. In this league right now, in the division where you’€™re going to see Pettitte, Sabathia, Price, and Matusz probably three, four times apiece, that lineup against left-handed pitching is going to be really important.

Are the Red Sox the second best team in the American League?

Probably the second-best team in baseball.

Are the Red Sox we’€™ll see in Fort Myers better than in October?

I think they’re better this year. I’€™ll tell you why. The whole run-scoring thing, I’m not that worried about. I think that the depth of the lineup will be very good. I think the depth of the roster is much better. It’s amazing to me they finished second, they had the second-best record, the second-best run differential, and they had 55 games started by [Brad] Penny, [John] Smoltz, [Paul] Bird, a bad [Daisuke] Matsuzaka, [Michael] Bowden and [Junichi] Tazawa. In 55 games, more than one-third of their games, their starting pitchers had a 6.28 earned run average, and they still had the second-best run differential and record in the league. They could change that a lot.”

By the way, in talking to our old friend Mike Roberts, who used to be a college coach but he runs the baseball program at Athletes Performance in Scottsdale, he said that Matsuzaka is in unbelievable shape. He’€™s been there for about five weeks so far. He said the transformation from last year is astounding.

Read More: Adrian Beltre, Alex Rodriguez, barry bonds, Daisuke Matsuzaka
Curt Schilling Discusses McGwire on The Big Show 01.11.10 at 5:06 pm ET
By   |  28 Comments

Retired pitcher Curt Schilling checked in with The Big Show to discuss Mark McGwire’s admission that he used steroids starting in 1989, including during the 1998 season in which he set the home run record. To listen to the complete interview, click here. A transcript is below.

What’€™s your take on McGwire and how he handled this?

I think he’€™s the first guy to come real clean ‘€“ legitimately clean. No more, ‘€˜Well, I did it once and I never did it again.’€™ I think everyone knew to some degree. But until you had your word, like everything else, it was speculation. I’€™m glad. I’€™m glad he did it.

Do you think this plays well with fans? He went into detail.

It seems like everybody else lies about it, then they lie about the lies. I always feel like any time you hear guys talk about stuff like this, there’€™s 10 times the stuff that you don’€™t know. He said he used it on and off throughout the ‘€˜90s. I’€™m probably pretty sure, based on playing against him, looking at him, the way he was the entire decade, he probably used the entire decade. Why wouldn’€™t you if you got the results he did from them?

Players probably chuckled when he said he wasn’€™t using steroids.

The ones that weren’€™t doing it with him, I’€™m sure.

Jose Canseco was another player who came completely clean.

Yeah, but he’€™s disgusting.

At the Congressional hearing, McGwire said that because lawyers told him to say that he should say what he did about not addressing the past. You said it’€™s a lot different under oath. Were you advised by attorneys?

The quotes that got me subpoenaed were locker-room chatter, grab-ass stuff that you do on a daily basis. In front of Congress, you’€™re under oath to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth. If you’€™re going to put a name out there, you’€™re going to end someone’€™s career and ruin someone’€™s life. Having not seen anyone inject themselves, anything I would have done, anyone I would have named would have been speculation. I certainly wasn’€™t going to get myself in trouble or get anyone else in trouble without a 100 percent guarantee of the fact that it’€™s true.

You’€™re guarded in the way you say things if you’€™re trying to hide or cover up. I didn’€™t know. I never knew. Everyone railed on me about clamming up. There was nothing for me to say. The comments that I’€™d been quoted on were the comments you made on a daily basis in the clubhouse when you were shooting the bull.

Half of it is crap. You speculate. You talk. Over the course of a nine-month season, a lot of people say a lot of things that are hyperbole and blown out of proportion. It was a common topic for a long period of time. I spent 10 years defending Roger Clemens ‘€“ the only guy in the clubhouse defending Roger Clemens.

Does this put pressure on other guys to come forward (aside from Clemens and Bonds, given their perjury cases)?

He told the story we’€™re expecting to hear from everyone else who got caught. That’€™s the story. That really is the only defense, unless you were a guy who went to a legitimate doctor and got a legitimate prescription for extreme cases where steroids are prescribed. If you don’€™t’€™ come out and do what he did, then everybody is going, ‘€˜Well, what else don’€™t we know?’€™

How do you think it plays out in the public and with Hall of Fame voters?

Knowing what I know about Mark McGwire, I don’€™t think he cares about either one. I think he wants to come back and coach and be on the baseball field, be in the clubhouse, be in the environment again. I don’€™t think he gives two wits about what guys say and write. I really don’€™t. He never was a guy who was motivated by that stuff.

I always looked at him kind of like I looked at Barry. You were one of the best ever, and you had to cheat to be better? I don’€™t get that.

Will this change the minds of voters? Will there be forgiveness in the public eye?

I love Mark and I think the world of Mark. I’€™ve known him for quite a long time. I don’€™t mean any disrespect, but I’€™m not sure he’€™s a Hall of Famer anyway. He hit a lot of homers for a lot of years and that’€™s all he did. I’€™m not belittling that, but the Hall of Fame is for the best of the best. He was never a guy, I don’€™t know. I think it will change, and he will end up getting a pass.

But there’€™s a line that, once it’€™s crossed, you can never go back. When that first player ‘€“ that Palmeiro or Bonds goes in ‘€“ then no one can ever use the steroid defense again, I don’€™t think.

Now that he’€™s admitted to use from the late-‘€˜80s on, his greatness was based on his power. We now know he got the power from PEDs.

I think he was a naturally huge guy anyway. I think he always had a lot of power. But I’€™ve always argued, and football players can probably give me a better response than other people, I’€™ve never looked at steroids as the motivation for guys to use them to get huge biceps.

In baseball, I always looked at steroids, the motivation being to recover faster and to be fresher. Everyone that talks about them talks about the downtime being smaller and less, and you feel fresh for the entire season. I would argue that gives you an enormous advantage over me on Sept. 1, when I’€™m pitching against you and I’€™m dragging ass and it’€™s six months into the season, and you’€™re showing up like it’€™s the first day of spring training.

To me, it wasn’€™t the biceps and triceps. It was the bat speed. To me, Mark McGwire and Barry Bonds were game-fresh, April-fresh on Sept. 1, that gave them a huge advantage in my mind.

We all talked about this ‘€“ all the freak injuries. It wasn’€™t a pulled hammy or a strained quad. It’€™s that everybody talks about the fact that steroids overstretch your body. You break joints. You tear ligaments in unusual or odd places. You look at all the guys over the last 10 years who we said, ‘€˜Hmmm, that’€™s kind of weird.’€™ You do freakish things to yourself from an injury standpoint. And people go, ‘€˜Wow ‘€“ that’€™s odd. That’€™s weird. How do you do something like that?’€™

How’€™d you get your body without steroids?

I always tell people this is not a real athletic body ‘€“ it’€™s a cruel family joke.

If McGwire’€™s motivation is to be back on the field, he was only going to be able to do this with a confession. We were trying to figure out how he’€™d do this. Now, he’€™s answered all the questions.

He did it perfectly. Other than admitting it five years ago, he did it perfectly. If I’€™m him, I sit there in spring training on that first day, and I say, ‘€˜You’€™ve got 60 minutes. I’€™ll answer every non-baseball question you want to ask me, and I won’€™t answer another one the entire season.’€™ He’€™s already answered everything you could want to ask him anyway. What else are you going to ask him? Who else do you know? He’€™s not going to answer that. He’€™s not going to throw other people under the bus.

It just reeks of honesty. He came clean, because I think he realized, I’€™m going to be in that environment, 24/7, for nine months of the year. I’€™m not going to give anyone an angle. I think he made the admission that we all wish everybody had made when they got caught, instead of the, ‘€˜Well, you know, I was trying to come back from injury and I only did it one time and it was my dad’€™s.’€™

If he gets positive treatment ‘€“ after being a pariah ‘€“ might more guys decide to confess?

The guys that don’€™t stand to get prison time, yes.

Giambi was accepted even though he never went into detail.

Another piece to this ‘€“ don’€™t discount this ‘€“ a lot of it has to deal with the people you’€™re dealing with. Everything I knew and have heard since about Barry, he was someone who was absolutely just a bad person.

To me, I always judge teammates on how they acted and interacted with non-uniform personnel, clubhouse kids, trainers and stuff. I’€™ve heard in the last couple years that Bonds was the worst ever at it and Clemens was not really cool about it. To me, that says more about you than anything else ‘€“ how you treat the quote-unquote little guy.

Jason Giambi is the world’€™s nicest guy. McGwire, really nice guy, those guys are going to get, I think, different treatment because they’€™re different people. They’€™re kind people.

I’€™ve heard things that [Bonds] has said and done. I knew Barry. I was friends with Barry. We had the same agent coming up, when I was coming up. I saw him say things and do things to people that I sat back and said, ‘€˜Wow.’€™

A lot of people cited race in how Bonds was treated by the media, yet Clemens got the same treatment.

[Bonds] treated people like crap, and half the time the race card was the card he played.

Clemens is in this until the end. What’€™s he thinking? If he’€™s clean, he’€™s a Hall of Famer.

I don’€™t think anybody on this planet thinks he’€™s clean. I don’€™t. And he was a guy who was instrumental in turning my career around. The lecture and speech I got from him was about hard work and dedication, passion, integrity, ethics, and all this other stuff. Then I come to find that it’€™s a lot of crap.

You can take steroids and still have a good work ethic.

Absolutely. That’€™s the thing about those guys. A-Rod and Bonds, those guys had unbelievable workout regimens that took it to another level. At the end of the day, it’€™s disappointing. It’€™s frustrating.

In a sense, I’€™m kind of like Pedro. I look back on what I did and the era I did it in, and I’€™m probably a little bit prouder of the fact that I did it the way I did it when all was said and done, and to think that I was competing against guys who were cheating, and probably a lot more than I knew.

At the end of the day, I got three rings. I don’€™t think steroids changed the amount of rings I got in my career, which is all I really care about.

Read More: barry bonds, congressional testimony, Curt Schilling, hall of fame
Red Sox Box Score
Red Sox Schedule
Latest on Twitter
Red Sox Headlines
Red Sox Minor League News
Red Sox Team Leaders
MLB Headlines
Tips & Feedback