|Jarrod Saltalamacchia: Added pressure on ourselves is ‘where we faltered’||02.17.12 at 3:24 pm ET|
And Friday afternoon, after a grueling day of work in the burning sun that baked both of his forearms, Saltalamacchia said he doesn’t feel any added pressure after “The Collapse” from last September.
“I don’t feel any added pressure, no, because we’re going to have to do it together,” Saltalamacchia said. “When I mean leader, I’m not going to have a ‘C’ on my chest, I’m not going to tell people what to do. But I’m going to go about my business the right way, lead by example a little bit on that front, and get to know the pitchers, get to know them a little more and find out what we can do.”
Saltalamacchia said he’s gotten a head start on the season by speaking with new pitching coach Bob McClure.
“I spoke with Bob, and he’s been great as far as the pitching side of it and getting feedback from him has been great,” Saltalamacchia said.
“I don’t think last year there was any kind of [lack of] leadership. We all knew what to do. You’re with a team that’s been there, done that. Guys with two rings, guys with one so we knew what we had to do. I think we might have put a little added pressure on ourselves and that’s where we faltered.”
|Larry Lucchino on Red Sox payroll, Carl Crawford, David Ortiz, Jason Varitek, Tim Wakefield and more||02.10.12 at 7:26 pm ET|
Red Sox president and CEO Larry Lucchino rebutted claims that his team is scaling back its spending this offseason, saying in multiple settings that his team plays on blowing past the $178 million luxury tax payroll and suggesting that the Sox will exceed the $189 million franchise payroll record, which was set last season.
In an appearance on Sirius/XM MLB Network Radio’s “Inside Pitch,” Lucchino painted a picture of a far-reaching commitment by team owners to the payroll, both over the duration of the group’s tenure (which began in 2002) and in 2012.
“Look at what we’ve done and not what we say. Since we have been here — we are now beginning our 11th year — our payroll has consistently been at the top end of Major League Baseball,” said Lucchino. “It has not been No. 1. That position has been reserved, probably permanently, for the New York Yankees, but it has been second most every year, and we have invested lots of money in amateur draft picks. We sign our draft picks at a much higher percentage than used to be the case. We’ve invested in international signings — you can look at some of our Cuban players and some of our Japanese players — and so we have invested dollars into this franchise because we recognize that the fundamental question about a franchise and about its ownership is, is there a commitment to winning. I think that our track record demonstrates that there is that commitment.
“Now, this year, if you want to talk specifically about 2012, we will have the highest payroll in the history of the Boston Red Sox in 2012,” Lucchino continued. “Will we eclipse the luxury tax threshold? To be sure, we will — once again. So I think the talk of us not spending needs to be viewed in the context of real facts and in comparisons to real dollars.”
In earlier comments to MLB.com, Lucchino also disputed the notion that the Red Sox’ spending has been impacted by the Fenway Sports Group’s ownership of the Liverpool Football Club.
“That has not been the case,” Lucchino said of the idea that the Red Sox ownership group was channeling its resources towards soccer players. “There has not been a situation where that was cited for a reason for us not to do something here.”
Asked for how he feels when his team is characterized as being “cheap,” Lucchino suggested amusement.
“It makes me laugh. It just proves the old adage that you can’t please all of the people all of the time. You certainly can’t please all of the sportswriters much of the time. But that’s OK,” said Lucchino. “What’s important to us is that our fans realize that we are in this to win it, and we operate accordingly.
“Are there financial constraints from time to time? Of course there are. No one has an unlimited budget to do absolutely everything they want to do. But with some common-sense parameters, as I said, we’re going to have the highest payroll in the history of the Boston Red Sox this year, and the commitment to winning from the very highest levels — John Henry, Tom Werner — throughout the entire organization, there is a powerful sense of obligation that our job is to commit to win, provide our fans with entertaining, competitive, winning baseball.”
(For a detailed look at the Red Sox payroll, click here.)
Lucchino also touched on a number of additional topics. Among them: Read the rest of this entry »
|Kelly Shoppach agreement spells likely end for Jason Varitek with Red Sox||12.13.11 at 11:22 am ET|
The writing had been on the wall for some time. Whenever he was asked about Jason Varitek this offseason, Red Sox GM Ben Cherington said that he would inform the 15-year veteran if the team decided to go another direction. Now, it appears that the Sox have decided to go in another direction.
According to a major league source, the Red Sox have reached an agreement with catcher Kelly Shoppach on a one-year, $1.35 million deal. (The deal was first reported by Jerry Crasnick of ESPN.com.) The contract is guaranteed.
Shoppach, taken with the Sox’ top pick in the 2001 draft, hit .176 (fifth lowest in the majors among the 355 players with 200 or more plate appearances) with a .268 OBP, .339 slugging mark, .607 OPS (325th in the majors) and 11 homers in 87 games with the Rays last season. It marked the third straight season in which the 31-year-old has seen declines in his average, OBP, slugging percentage and OPS since a career-best 2008 season in which Shoppach hit .261/.348/.517/.865 with 21 homers for the Indians.
However, Shoppach had far better numbers against left-handed pitchers. He hit .241 with a .344 OBP, .444 slugging mark, .788 OPS and seven homers against southpaws. Moreover, he threw out 41 percent of potential base-stealers last year, the top caught stealing percentage in the American League.
Shoppach made his big league debut with the Sox in 2005, playing nine games in the majors and going 0-for-15. He was traded that offseason to the Indians as part of the deal that resulted in the acquisition of center fielder Coco Crisp. Shoppach spent four years with the Indians before being traded to the Rays prior to the 2010 season.
The Sox had expressed a desire to have a veteran in spring training who would compete with Ryan Lavarnway for the job of a complement to expected starter Jarrod Saltalamacchia. Shoppach appears to be that catcher, something that would appear to render Varitek expendable. Moreover, the guaranteed deal for Shoppach also increases the likelihood that the Sox can return Lavarnway to Triple-A so that he can get regular playing time behind the plate to complete his minor league development. Read the rest of this entry »
|Red Sox prepared to cut ties to Jason Varitek, Tim Wakefield||12.07.11 at 4:38 am ET|
DALLAS — It was not a definitive verdict. Red Sox GM Ben Cherington did not say that a pair of franchise linchpins would not be back.
But he came close. The words did not represent a significant departure from previous statements this winter, but nonetheless, Cherington made it sound like it is increasingly likely that knuckleballer Tim Wakefield (after 17 years with the Sox) and catcher Jason Varitek (15 years into his Sox tenure) may have seen the end of their days in Boston.
“We’re not ready to commit to anything. I have spoken to both and plan to talk to them both again. Certainly we’ll do so before we make any final decision,” said Cherington. “I have a great deal of respect for both and feel like the best thing for the team and the best thing for them is, if there’s not a real role on the team, I’m not sure it’s fair, I’m not sure it’s the right thing for them or the team. We haven’t gotten to that point yet. I’ll talk to them when we get closer to that.’
Varitek, who turns 40 in April, hit .221 with a .300 OBP, .423 slugging mark and 11 homers in 68 games in 2011. Wakefield, 45, went 7-8 with a 5.12 ERA last season, making 23 starts and pitching 154 2/3 innings, his most since 2008. Wakefield remains seven wins short of the Red Sox’ all-time career wins record.
|Ben Cherington on M&M talks Bobby Valentine, Theo Epstein, rabid Sox fans||12.02.11 at 12:41 pm ET|
Cherington took the hosts through the process of how Valentine was selected, explaining why he was added to the list of candidates late.
“I met with Bobby, I think it was the first week of November, third or fourth, somewhere around there,” Cherington recalled. “I had a couple-of-hours meeting with him where we really just talked baseball, talked about the managing job, talked a little bit about our team. That was the first time I had met him. And I was impressed. He struck me clearly as a really smart guy, engaging, passionate guy, cared a lot. And he really wanted another shot at managing in the big leagues. And he was particularly interested in Boston, he fit and the chance to win and all those things.
“After that meeting I began to think about it more, but still focused on the candidates that we were bringing in formally. I think a couple of things happened as the process moved forward. No. 1, we got to know a lot of candidates and really enjoyed that process. Everyone we talked to would be capable of being an excellent manager. Certainly, Dale Sveum‘s going to get that chance in Chicago.
“But we did feel as we moved deeper into the process that experienced mattered. I think [it was] when we went from thinking about our next manager in sort of a theoretical sense to thinking about it in more of a practical sense and a real sense. It’s not just philosophy and qualities and the sort-of softer subjects, but the guy’s got to hit the ground running and know how to navigate the land mines that exist in a clubhouse and put our team in a position to be good right away. We did start to emphasize experience more as we got deeper into the process.
“As that happened, we talked to Gene Lamont. And as we were doing that, I was doing more research and doing work on Bobby and getting to know him better through other people. At that point we decided to include him in the process formally. And as I said yesterday, there was an interest on our part to sort of shorten the window that he was included as a public candidate because of the position he was in at ESPN and the potential conflict there. I just thought it would be uncomfortable for everyone, including Bobby and certainly ESPN, to have him out there publicly acknowledged as a candidate while he was doing that job.
“So, there was a variety of factors for it. In the end we felt that Bobby and Gene were the best two candidates for the job and worked a lot on it, again over Thanksgiving thought a lot about it, that weekend after Thanksgiving. And ultimately, I can’t remember exactly when it was, but sometime Monday I recommended to ownership that we offer him the job.”
Cherington said that while Sveum was a solid early candidate, in the end he might not have been the right fit for the Sox this year.
“I don’t think so,” Cherington said, explaining: “As we got deeper into it and we actually got into formal interviews and talked about X’s and O’s and talked about what actually would you do in this situation and this situation, what would you do on May 15th when this happened — those sorts of questions, the real questions — it sort of came to light for me that experience really did matter in this particular situation for this team at this moment. Given where we are, that became more important. So, I do feel like we were going to be sort of headed in that direction. And ultimately that’s why Gene and Bobby ended up being the finalists.”
|What the arbitration offers mean for the Red Sox and David Ortiz, Jason Varitek and Dan Wheeler||11.23.11 at 10:32 pm ET|
The Red Sox offered salary arbitration to free agents David Ortiz and Dan Wheeler, while declining to offer it to free agent catcher Jason Varitek prior to a midnight deadline to make such an offer to free agents. In doing so, the Sox guaranteed that should either Ortiz or Wheeler sign with other teams, they will receive draft picks as compensation for their departures.
In the case of Ortiz, a Type A free agent, the Sox will receive two draft picks should he sign with another team. The fact that a team would have to part with a draft pick in order to sign Ortiz might also dampen his free agent market, since other teams might be reluctant to give Ortiz a multi-year deal while also parting with a pick that would likely come from either the first or second round. The Sox are now the only team that can offer Ortiz a contract without losing a draft pick for signing him; added to the acknowledged mutual interest in continuing their relationship, the Sox’ offer now increases the likelihood that such an outcome will occur.
Of course, Ortiz (who turned 36 last week) could also accept salary arbitration, in which case he would likely be in line for an increase over the $12.5 million salary he received in 2011, coming off a year in which he hit .309 with a .398 OBP, .554 slugging mark, .953 OPS, 29 homers and 96 RBI in 146 games. Read the rest of this entry »
|Red Sox free agents could yield draft pick haul||10.31.11 at 2:16 pm ET|
The departure of valuable free agents can be an important part of an organization’s renewal.
If teams offer salary arbitration to their top free agents only to see them reject the offer and sign with other teams, they can receive draft pick compensation. The top class of free agents — known as Type A free agents — as determined by a formula from the Elias Sports Bureau net two top picks (usually either a first- or second-round pick from the team that signs the player, as well as a sandwich round pick between the first and second rounds). A second tier of free agents — Type B — net a team a sandwich-round pick.
The Sox have acquired a number of key prospects through compensation picks, including: Jacoby Ellsbury, Clay Buchholz, Jed Lowrie, Nick Hagadone and Bryan Price (both part of the trade for Victor Martinez), Bryce Brentz, Anthony Ranaudo and others.
While revised draft rules are currently under negotiation between the owners and the Players’ Association, those rules are not expected to impact this year’s class of free agents. Instead, the “old” rules of draft pick compensation are believed by multiple sources to apply to this year’s free agent class.
That, in turn, may have played a part in a Red Sox option decision today. Reliever Dan Wheeler is a Type B free agent. The Sox held a $3 million option on his contract for the 2012 season. While that isn’t unreasonable for a right-handed reliever with a strong track record (especially prior to the 2011 season) in the AL East, the Sox declined the option. Now, they have the option to offer Wheeler arbitration and get a draft pick if he signs with another club.
MLBTradeRumors.com offered a full list of Type A and Type B free agents here. Among the Red Sox players who have filed for free agency, here are the notable ones who could entitle the club to draft pick compensation:
Type A — David Ortiz
Type A — Jonathan Papelbon
Type B — Dan Wheeler (team option)
Type B — Jason Varitek
The Sox have been talking to Ortiz during the exclusive negotiating window between teams and their own free agents. As of this weekend, WEEI.com reported on Sunday, there had been no contact between the Sox and Papelbon.
Wheeler was 2-2 with a 4.38 ERA, 1.115 WHIP, 7.1 strikeouts per nine innings and 1.5 walks per nine. The Rhode Island native started the year poorly, carrying an ERA of 11.32 when he landed on the disabled list for the first time of his career in the first week of May. After returning, he was one of the Sox’ most effective relievers, with a 1.53 ERA from mid-May through the beginning of September. However, a forearm injury rendered him ineffective and then unavailable for most of September (another of the many causes of the Sox’ September collapse), leading to his season-ending numbers.
As for Varitek, the Sox did not offer him arbitration when he was a Type B free agent last year, based on the expectation that he would accept (coming off a $3 million salary in 2010, the second year of a two-year, $8 million deal). This year, Varitek is once again a Type B, though he had a lower base salary ($2 million), which could have an impact on whether or not he is offered arbitration, insofar as — if he accepted — he would be in line for a lower salary this year than had he accepted arbitration a year ago.
The Sox also declined their option on Scott Atchison, who would have earned $200,000 over the major league minimum. He remains on the club’s 40-man roster, however, after going 1-0 with a 3.26 ERA in 17 big league games spanning 30 1/3 innings. The 35-year-old right-hander is out of options, but fell just short of arbitration eligibility. That being the case, the Sox can set his salary for 2012.
|Jason Varitek on WAAF: ‘I believe this team liked each other’||10.19.11 at 11:23 am ET|
Red Sox catcher Jason Varitek defended his teammates and lashed out at the unnamed sources who have been revealing clubhouse details during an appearance on Wednesday’s Hill-Man Morning Show on WEEI sister station WAAF.
During his hour-long appearance, Varitek said the team disharmony was not at the level that has been reported, nor did the team tune out manager Terry Francona.
“Did this team respect Terry Francona? I would say yes,” Varitek said. “Everybody has their own respect for their own manager, yes. ‘¦ I honestly can’t speak for anyone. But, yes, he is your boss. What I believe in is you’re going to have coaches you don’t like, you’re going to have management you don’t like, you have players you don’t like, but I’m still going to play with that utter respect. This is my elder. This is the way I was brought up, the way I was raised. No matter what, I’m going to respect them and treat them with that same respect.
“Whether guys are going to go in a foxhole with somebody, at this point it doesn’t matter. Because you have to function. He’s still our boss. It doesn’t matter what happens. He makes the lineup, we go out and play. He makes the lineup, we go out and play. And with him, whether or not guys would go in a foxhole or have that much respect, you have to. You don’t get to that many wins and those things going on.”
Added Varitek: “What I disagreed with was that this team didn’t like each other. I believe this team liked each other. Whether [Francona] lost this team or didn’t lose that team and he felt that way, that’s the way he felt. Whether he does or doesn’t, and feels like he loses this team, those things, in my opinion, it always comes back to us. Because when it comes down to it, whether his chain of command, he’s our manager, we have directions, we have to perform. We didn’t perform.”
|Dustin Pedroia on The Big Show clears the air on Red Sox clubhouse||10.12.11 at 4:46 pm ET|
Red Sox second baseman Dustin Pedroia interrupted his vacation in Mexico to call into the Big Show and discuss the Boston Globe article that portrayed the Sox clubhouse as an environment rife with dysfunction, in which teammates lapsed into apathy about the performance of the club as the season slowly drifted away.
Pedroia took issue with the characterization of the Sox clubhouse, suggesting that it featured numerous leaders, and pointing the fault for the team’s epic collapse to poor play on the field.
Pedroia suggested that he was “upset” about the portrayal of the clubhouse, and that he was “[hurt]” by the suggestion that manager Terry Francona‘s job had been compromised by personal problems.
That said, Pedroia vowed to put behind him the brutal disappointment of the end of the season. He suggested that he wants to remain in Boston for the duration of his career even with the departure of Francona, and he said that the team would feature renewed resolve entering 2012.
“We’ll come back motivated, I promise you guys,” said Pedroia.
To listen to the complete interview, click here. A transcript of the conversation is below:
On the Boston Globe article on Red Sox clubhouse dysfunction:
I’m pretty upset about it. A lot of the stuff that was said was pretty much not fair. It hurts, man. It’s not good.
We’re all baseball players. I showed up to work every day ready to beat the other team. So did everyone else. We’re a family. We had the best record in baseball up until Sept. whatever, and then we ran out of gas. That doesn’t have anything to do with Tito or Theo or any players or what went on in the clubhouse. The leadership was there. We had guys that cared. We didn’t play well in the end. That’s it. Read the rest of this entry »
|Ryan Lavarnway: ‘This is what you dream about as a kid’||09.28.11 at 12:44 am ET|
BALTIMORE — Ryan Lavarnway had long since proven his credentials as a hitter. For three years as a Red Sox minor leaguer, the 24-year-old had demonstrated that he had the makings of a legitimate big league hitter, thanks to both a sound, disciplined plate approach and a compact swing that produced more consistent power than any other Sox minor leaguer.
Even so, there had been skepticism at times about his defense. He was viewed by some as wooden behind the plate — even though he’d worked hard for years to improve his behind-the-plate athleticism. There were questions about his ability to control the running game, even though he’d thrown out 37 percent of attempted base stealers while making just one throwing error in 2011, the top marks among Sox minor league catchers. And then there were the questions about whether he was up to the task of being a signal caller who could earn the trust of a pitching staff.
“It was rumored he wasn’t great defensively but he was a good hitter,” Sox catcher Luis Exposito, Lavarnway’s teammate last year in Double-A and this year in Triple-A, said before the game. “For me, he’s definitely, from what I’ve heard and seen, developed into a good catcher. He’s done the work he’s needed to do. He’s developed himself into this situation where he’s the guy tonight.”
And so he was. Lavarnway, who enjoyed a stint as the Sox DH at the end of August and also spent a few innings behind the plate in the late innings of some games, made his first big league start as a catcher on Tuesday night, at a time when both Jason Varitek and Jarrod Saltalamacchia had been injured. Read the rest of this entry »
Latest from Bleacher Report
- Dustin Pedroia Injury: Updates on Red Sox Star's Recovery from Knee...
- Complete Offseason Guide, Predictions for the Boston Red Sox
- John Farrell to Return as Red Sox Manager: Latest Contract Details,...
- Red Sox's Disappointing ALDS Sweep Ends Iconic David Ortiz Era on Down...
- Ramirez, Ortiz, Betts Each Record 30+ Home Runs, 100+ RBI
- Indians vs. Red Sox ALDS Game 3: Live Score and Highlights
- David Price Allowed 5 ER in 3.1 IP and Is Now 0-8 in Career Postseason...
- Fall/Winter League Roundup: Moncada shines in AFL
- SoxProspects Featured Video: Mauricio Dubon
- Podcast Ep. #107: Instructs 2016
- Scouting Scratch: Fall Instructs Part Three
- Weekly Notes: Scouting Instructs, Moncada reassigned to the minors
- 2016 SoxProspects.com All-Stars
- Scouting Scratch: Fall Instructs Part Two, Jason Groome and Gerson Bautista
- Scouting Scratch: Fall Instructs Part One
- Weekly Notes: Fall Instructional League begins
- Podcast Ep. #106: AJ No-Teller