|10 biggest Red Sox trade deadline deals since 2000||07.28.16 at 10:47 am ET|
With the trade deadline looming, it’s hard not to look back on the Red Sox’ deals since the turn of the century.
Two notes on this list: The first is that these are the biggest deals, good or bad, which means yes, a couple 2014 deals will make this list.
The second is that waiver and offseason deals are not included. This includes the blockbuster 2012 deal that sent a quarter of a billion dollars to the Dodgers in the form of Carl Crawford, Adrian Gonzalez and Josh Beckett.
With all that in mind, here are the Red Sox’ 10 biggest pre-deadline deals since 2000:
10. David Murphy (and others) for Eric Gagne, 2007
The Red Sox already had a solid bullpen anchored by Jonathan Papelbon, but Boston felt the need to add another reliever to make a strong playoff push.
David Murphy, Engel Beltre and Kason Gabbard was a high price at the time for a once-dominant reliever in the twilight of his career, and Gagne turned out to not be worth it, as he posted an awful 6.75 ERA over 20 appearances down the stretch.
Gagne continued to struggle as fall arrived, most notably blowing Game 2 of the ALCS against the Indians. He did pitch one scoreless inning in the World Series and came away with a ring, but it was not enough to overshadow his disastrous time in Boston.
Compared to what Murphy, touted as one of the Sox’ best prospects at the time, gave Texas for seven years (a solid .777 OPS), Gagne was one of the biggest busts in recent Red Sox memory.
9. Andrew Miller for Eduardo Rodriguez, 2014
The 2014 trade season will be remembered as a horrible one for the Red Sox, but this deal was one most Boston fans were thrilled with at the time.
The Red Sox decided that since Miller, one of Boston’s top relievers, was at the end of his contract, they would see what they could get and turned to the Orioles. Rodriguez, touted as one of Baltimore’s top prospects, looked like a great return.
Rodriguez would work his way up through Portland and Pawtucket to the majors, and pitched a solid 2015 campaign for the Red Sox. Currently, he has yet to return to that form, but at 23 years old, he still has time to develop into a solid rotation pitcher.
Miller, meanwhile, pitched extremely well for Baltimore after this deal, but at the end of the season was scooped up by the Yankees.
|Cancer survivor Jon Lester reaches out to former manager John Farrell: ‘He’s in good hands’||08.15.15 at 1:28 am ET|
Lester was diagnosed with anaplastic large cell lymphoma in August of 2006, while Farrell revealed Friday he has stage 1 lymphoma.
“I talked to him a little bit already,” Lester said to reporters in Chicago. “It was good. He seems pretty positive. Everything seems pretty positive, so that’s good.”
The former Red Sox pitcher was treated in Boston just under 10 years ago, so he has a good idea of the doctors and what treatment may be like.
“He’s in a good place for it,” Lester said of the medical care he will receive both from the Red Sox and at Mass General. “Obviously, it’s one of the better places, if not the best place in the country to be [to get treatment] if you do have cancer. He’s in good hands. I know those doctors pretty well. It seems like he’s doing well.”
Lester said it’s nothing you can prepare for.
“It’s one of those things you have to just ride out,” he said. “You have to do what the doctors tell you to do. I don’t know the details of what he’ll be going through or anything like that. I don’t know the type. I just know it’s lymphoma — it can be a million different things. It sounded pretty curable, it sounded pretty positive from what I read and what I saw. That’s the most important thing. I don’t think you can ever prepare for a situation like that. You just have to kind of grind through it.”
Farrell was Lester’s pitching coach before being his manager for two years and Lester is joining the entire Red Sox organization and baseball world in believing Farrell will get through it.
“I don’t really think you give John too much advice,” Lester said. “If you know John, he’s pretty strong-willed. I would imagine he’ll be fine. I’m sure it’s a little bit of a blow for his family. I’m sure he’ll be fine through this whole process.”
Great win today but heavy hearted after learning about John Farrell. Thoughts and prayers going out to the Farrell fam. You got this buddy!
‘ Jon Lester (@JLester34) August 15, 2015
|Former Red Sox pitcher Jon Lester records first career hit with Cubs||07.06.15 at 10:11 pm ET|
Jon Lester lost two no-hit bids on Monday night against the Cardinals, and one of them has been a long time coming.
In the second inning against former teammate John Lackey, Lester lined an infield single off of Lackey’s shin, legging out the first hit of his career.
Lester had started his career 0-for-66 (with another 0-for-5 in the World Series) before he finally ended his record run of futility. It was the longest hitless streak to start a career in big league history.
Lester had another no-hit bid end in the seventh when Jhonny Peralta lined a single off the glove of third baseman Kris Bryant with one out. A Bryant error extended the inning, and the Cardinals went on to score two runs to take a 2-0 lead in support of Lackey.
Win or lose, at least Lester doesn’t have to worry about getting that first hit anymore.
|Red Sox pitching coach Juan Nieves: Don’t worry about Jon Lester throwing over||04.10.15 at 11:32 am ET|
NEW YORK — It took just one start for the panic to set in at Wrigley Field.
Jon Lester doesn’t make pickoff throws! In fact, he has now gone 66 straight games without attempting a throw to first, with the last one coming all the way back on April 30, 2013.
The reason for the sudden attention to Lester’s approach with runners on base was due to the usually station-to-station Cardinals attempting four steals off the lefty in his first start as a Cub.
For those who lived through the reality of Lester’s approach with the Red Sox, the conversation seems much to do about nothing.
“It’s not a big deal,” said Red Sox pitching coach Juan Nieves. “First of all, he’s a guy who changes patterns and times to the plate. A lot of guys never ran on him because how quick he is to the plate.
“I know we practiced a lot in spring training, but he decided to vary his holds and focus on his pitching. I thought he managed that correctly.”
Nieves served as Lester’s pitching coach for 59 regular and postseason starts, during which time the starter went 29-16 with a 3.11 ERA. In that span the pitcher saw baserunners succeed in stealing 22 of 29 times. It was 31 fewer attempts than John Lackey endured in the same time period, and the same as Felix Doubront (who allowed two more successful steals).
|Buster Olney on MFB: Dustin Pedroia’s power biggest takeaway from Opening Day||04.08.15 at 11:58 am ET|
ESPN’s Buster Olney made his weekly appearance on with Middays with MFB on Wednesday to talk about the Red Sox after their impressive start to the season. To hear the interview, go to the MFB audio on demand page.
“The fact that Pedroia hit for power to me was the thing that jumped out,” Olney said. “Because I know all of last year — and look, nobody engenders more respect around baseball than Dustin Pedroia does, and people love the way he plays, but I heard it from a lot of people, whether it was scouts or other players, they wondered if Dustin was ever going to get back to being able to hit for any kind of power, because he’s had so many nagging injuries — wrist, hands, the whole thing — and that was a great sign on the first day that he was able to do something.
“When you’re playing the Phillies right now it is a little bit Christians and the lions situation because they are really bad. But that’s a great start for them.”
The much-maligned Clay Buchholz pitched like a No. 1, allowing no runs and just three hits through seven innings.
“We’ve seen it in the past, he’s certainly capable of pitching really well,” Olney said. “And you’re right, it’s a good sign, it doesn’t matter who you’re facing. You can only compete against the guys who are in front of you. … Everything that I saw, he looked in command. Most of the time you liked the tempo, which I always thought was a barometer when you watch Buchholz is how quickly is he working between pitches. The faster he works, the better it seems he is; the slower he works, the more uncertain he seems to be. The other day he seemed like he was very comfortable.
“It’s a great first sign from a team that needs, let’s face it, contributions from all ends of their rotation.”
|SI’s Tom Verducci on MFB: Red Sox ‘the best team in a very weak division’||04.06.15 at 1:07 pm ET|
Sports Illustrated’s Tom Verducci checked in with Middays with MFB on Monday to talk about the Red Sox and other news from around the majors. To hear the interview, go to the MFB audio on demand page.
“I do think the Red Sox are the best team in a very weak division,” he said. “It could be 90 wins or maybe even less to win this division. You could make a case for any team to finish first — and maybe even last. … But to me the Red Sox are a team that has the best offense in all of Major League Baseball. And I think their pitching is just good enough to be the best in a weak division.”
There’s been speculation that the Red Sox will go after a premier pitcher sooner rather than later, but Verducci said that might not be as crucial as some people think.
“I’m not a real big believer in that,” he said. “I know a lot has been focused on the fact that the Red Sox don’t have an ace. The team that won the division last year with 94 wins didn’t have an ace — the Baltimore Orioles. I just think the way the game is played now is entirely different than what it was 10 or 20 years ago.
“Listen, in a perfect world I’d rather have the Nationals rotation than anybody else in baseball — I’d want five aces. There’s just not enough of those pitchers to go around. But with a dynamic offense, I think they have a premier defense, I think their defense could be one of the top three in the American League.
“To me, actually, the key is going to be the bullpen. Whether they have the right pieces now, whether they make changes during the course of the season. I think you can win with basically average starting pitching as long as you have a great offense, really good defense — which they have — and a really good bullpen. And I think the key is actually figuring out how they use their bullpen and what the construct is of that bullpen.”
|Curt Schilling on D&C: ‘You don’t have to have an ace to win’||02.25.15 at 10:24 am ET|
Former Red Sox pitcher Curt Schilling joined Dennis & Callahan on Wednesday morning to talk about the American League East, pitching, the Red Sox and more. To hear the interview, go to the Dennis & Callahan audio on demand page.
As it usually is in February, but more this year than others for Schilling, it’s tough to judge how good the American League East will be. There are question marks around many of the teams in the division, and different aspects of different clubs put them in position to fight for the first spot in the division or end up at the bottom.
“I don’t know that it’s terrible,” the ESPN analyst said. “The team that, to me, that could win by 15 games and I wouldn’t be shocked is Toronto.
“If you look around the division,” Schilling continued,”in Baltimore, they have by far one of the division’s best game managers and a roster that’s talented, but there are more talented rosters. I think if you look at Boston, you have a guy who’s a great communicator, probably not even, I don’t think anybody is the game manager that Buck Showalter is, and a very talented roster, but again, it’s February and there has never been a year for me more so than this year where they’re saying, ‘Hey, I want to see where they are at the end of camp.'”
Though the Red Sox have added some offense to the lineup, Schilling isn’t as enamored with the additions as some have been.
“I think it makes their lineup deeper,” he said. “As long as they’re healthy and David [Ortiz] is David and Pedey [Dustin Pedroia] is back. I don’t know, and maybe it’s personal, I never get overly emotional about offensive signings just because you can score as many runs as you want, but if you can’t stop them from scoring it doesn’t matter.”
|Morning Fort: Dustin Pedroia arrives healthy, proclaims ‘everyone’s fired up and ready to go’||02.21.15 at 9:52 am ET|
FORT MYERS, Fla. — Dustin Pedroia has had enough of hand surgeries. He’s also had enough of last place finishes.
He and the Red Sox have proven the ability to overcome both over the last two seasons. He’s hoping to repeat the comeback story again in 2015.
Last September, Pedroia had season-ending surgery on his left wrist to relieve tendon pressure and remove scar tissue buildup. In Nov. 2013, after helping the Red Sox to a World Series title, the second baseman had UCL surgery on his left thumb. Pedroia suffered an initial thumb injury on a head-first slide into first base on opening day at Yankee Stadium in 2013. In last year’s home opener against the Brewers, Pedroia slid head-first into second base and re-injured the hand.
Pedroia said Saturday morning upon arriving at JetBlue Park that he’s all set and ready to go, with no restrictions.
“Yeah, I feel great,” Pedroia said. “I’m ready to go. I’m excited. It’s fun. Getting back to work. It’s a new year. Everyone’s excited so it should be fun.”
As for his offseason?
“Lifted weights. Got ready, man,” Pedroia said. “Same as every other offseason except the last couple I’ve had to deal with surgeries and stuff. I got this one done quick so I was able to have a normal offseason of lifting weights and conditioning and all that stuff. I’m ready to go.”
As for his team, Pedroia is well aware of the worst-to-first-to-worst trend from 2012 through 2014. Now, with a rebuilt starting rotation and the additions of Pablo Sandoval and Hanley Ramirez, there are great expectations again after a 71-91 finish last year. And Pedroia shares that optimism.
“Yeah, we’ve obviously done it before. But you have to take it one day [at a time]. We have to worry about today’s practice and go out there and try to get better today,” Pedroia said. “You can’t look at the big picture. If you do the right things every day, at the end you’ll be where you’re at.
“We made a lot of great moves. Obviously, we have a very talented group. It’s our job to form it together and play together. Everyone’s excited and ready to play baseball. It was kind of a long winter. Everyone’s fired up and ready to go.” Read the rest of this entry »
|A look at how Red Sox starting rotation took shape (and why it doesn’t include Max Scherzer, James Shields)||02.16.15 at 11:36 pm ET|
FORT MYERS, Fla. — The entire Red Sox starting rotation — Clay Buchholz, Justin Masterson, Rick Porcello, Wade Miley and Joe Kelly — walked out to the back fields at Fenway South Monday, ready to partake in another day of drills and throwing.
It is still five days before the official reporting date for pitchers and catchers, and the entire group has already been roaming the JetBlue Park fields in their Red Sox garb for at least a few days.
Cole Hamels rumors or not, this potentially ace-less collection has already dug in on believing they are all the Red Sox need.
“Of course you want to ride with the group we have,” Kelly said. “I don’t know if anybody has paid any attention to that. I think everybody’s so new here our minds are focused on coming in here, focusing in on spring training and having a good year. But pitching is pitching and we’ll see how it shapes up for all five of us. … If everybody had their career year, we would be unstoppable.”
Unless the Phillies’ price drops, the Red Sox are also dug in on this bunch. So, how did they arrive at such a rotation?
According to major league sources, here are some particulars about the Red Sox’ approach to picking these pieces:
— The Red Sox did have interest in free agent Max Scherzer, actually valuing him as much as Jon Lester. But after numerous discussions with Scherzer’s agent, Scott Boras, it became clear the righty’s price tag was going to be too big for the Red Sox’ to swallow.
According to one source, at no point during the offseason did Boras hint that he was concerned Scherzer wouldn’t get his money, potentially leading to a more palatable reduced rate. In the end, the former Tigers hurler inked a seven-year, $210 million deal with the Nationals.
— The Red Sox did meet with free agent James Shields at the winter meetings, but never identified the starter as a great fit. It was determined by the organization that pitching home games at Fenway Park might not be the best avenue for Shields, who carries a career record of 2-9 with a 5.42 ERA. The money Shields ultimately got with the Padres — four years, $75 million with a fifth year club option for $16 million — was in the vicinity of the Red Sox anticipated.
|Jon Lester would have said ‘probably yes’ to 5-year, $120 million offer last spring from Red Sox||12.18.14 at 8:46 pm ET|
Former Red Sox pitcher and current Cubs pitcher Jon Lester joined the Hot Stove show Thursday night with Mike Mutnansky, Rob Bradford and Alex Speier to discuss what the free agent process was like, what the negotiations last spring training were like with the Red Sox, and also what it was like the hours and days following officially signing with the Cubs.
Lester signed with the Cubs for six years and $155 million, with a vesting option for a seventh year.
Everyone keeps coming back to the reported four-year, $70 million offer the Red Sox gave to Lester during spring training last season. What if the Red Sox came in with a higher offer — such as the Cliff Lee, five-year, $120 million deal — would Lester have accepted?
“That is one of those deals where hindsight is 20/20. You go back in time and you look at it and you go, ‘probably yes,’ ” said Lester. “I mean you don’t know. I mean it is one of those deals where when it is sitting in front of you that is a lot of money to turn down. That would have made it very difficult to turn it down.”
Following spring training, Lester and his camp were under the impression the two sides would not discuss a contract during the season because that was what was agreed between them and the Red Sox, and they didn’t want any distractions for he and his teammates during the year.
“As far as I understood, and that is not coming from my agent, that is from what I understood coming out of everyone’s mouth was that once the season started, I think we had all agreed upon that and it wasn’t just one side saying we don’t negotiate during the season,” Lester said. “I think it was more a group discussion and a group decision that if we weren’t able to come to a conclusion with the contract negotiations before the season started we thought it was in the best interest of everybody to table it ’till the offseason and wait until the season is over and all the distractions of playing, the ups and downs of the season and all that to get after it again.
“Like I said the other day, I don’t know if that is a bad quality or a good quality, but I am kind of hard-headed when it comes to that. If we make a decision one way or the other, just like if we would have made the decision to continue talking I would have expected that to continue. I think we all kind of decided at that time with the distractions of everything going on it wasn’t the right time or place to continue the discussions.”
Latest from Bleacher Report
- Red-Hot Red Sox Emerging as Alpha Dog in AL
- David Ortiz Passes Dave Kingman for Most HRs by a Player in His Final...
- Dustin Pedroia Injury: Updates on Red Sox Star's Knee and Return
- Price Starting to Become Clutch Ace at Crucial Time
- David Ortiz Comments on Donald Trump
- Yoan Moncada to Be Recalled from Double-A Portland by Red Sox
- Moncada Could Provide Red Sox with Spark
- Scouting Scratch: Fall Instructs Part One
- Weekly Notes: Fall Instructional League begins
- Podcast Ep. #106: AJ No-Teller
- Weekly Notes: Benintendi & Moncada among award winners
- SoxProspects.com 2016 season-end award winners
- Groome highlights 2016 Fall Instructional League roster
- Moncada named Baseball America's Minor League Player of the Year
- Weekly Notes: Minor league season ends, Moncada struggles in Bigs
- Cup of Coffee: Salem's narrow loss ends season for whole system
- Podcast Ep. #105: MoncadainBoston